期刊文献+

细胞角蛋白19片段和CEA在良、恶性胸水中的鉴别诊断意义 被引量:3

Measuring CYFRA_(21-1) and CEA levels for differentiation d iagnosis of benign and malignant ple ural fluid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的联合检测血清和胸水中细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)和CEA含量,旨在探讨其对良、恶性胸水的鉴别诊断意义。方法用免疫放射法(IRMA)检测血清及胸水CYFRA21-1,并用放射免疫法(RIA)检测CEA水平。结果非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)组胸水CYFRA21-1较结核组及小细胞肺癌(SCLC)组明显增高(P<0.01);NSCLC组胸水CYFRA21-1较血清CYFRA21-1亦明显升高(P<0.01);结核组CEA胸水/血清值(CEAp/s)较肺癌组明显低(P<0.01);联合检测胸水CYFRA21-1及CEAp/s对肺癌诊断的敏感性为100%,特异性为76.8%,准确性为88.4%。结论联合检测胸水和血清CYFRA21-1及CEAp/s对良、恶性胸水的鉴别诊断有一定价值。 Objective To measure CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels in serum and pleural fl uid and investigate the roles in differentiation diagnosis of benig n and malignant pleural fluid.Methods To measure CYFRA 21-1 levels in serum and pleural fluid by RIA.Results CYFRA 21-1 levels of non-small lung cancer(NSCLC)group were higher than those of tuberculosis group and small cell lung cancer(SCLC)group in pleural fluid(P<0.01).CYFRA 21-1 level of pleural fluid was higher than that of serum in NSCLC group.The ration of pl eural fluid to serum for CEA(CEA p /s)in tuberculosis group was lower than that of in lung cancer group(P<0.01).If CYFRA 21-1 levels and CEA p /s in pleural fluid we re measured simultaneously rate were 100%,the specificity rate was 76.8%,the a ccuracy rate was 88.4%.Conclusions It had potential value to measure CYFRA 21-1 levels and CEA p /s simultaneously for diffe rentiation diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural fluid.[
出处 《中国航天医药杂志》 2002年第4期32-34,共3页 Medical Journal of CASE
关键词 细胞角蛋白19片段 CEA 恶性 胸水 鉴别诊断 良性 CYFRA 21-1 CEA Pleural fluid Differentiation d iagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献1

  • 1李蓉,国外医学.肿瘤学分册,1996年,23卷,98页 被引量:1

共引文献30

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部