期刊文献+

LLLR与OLLR治疗左外叶肝细胞癌临床效果及远期生存率比较 被引量:5

Comparison of clinical efficacy and long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving LLLR and OLLR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜左肝外切除术(LLLR)与开腹左肝外切除术(OLLR)治疗左外叶肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床效果及生存期。方法我院2011年4月~2013年6月收治的左外叶HCC患者94例,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组47例和观察组47例,分别接受OLLR和LLLR治疗。比较两组患者手术指标及并发症发生情况。采用ELISA法检测血清细胞间黏附分子(ICAM)-1、基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-13和IL-6,常规检测血清炎症因子和免疫球蛋白水平变化。术后随访3年,比较两组患者术后1 a、2 a和3 a生存率。结果观察组术中出血量为(134.94±23.51)ml,显著低于对照组[(290.18±30.76)ml,P<0.01],首次进食时间为(2.29±0.51)d,显著短于对照组[(3.80±0.87)d,P<0.01],住院时间为(7.43±2.39)d,显著短于对照组[(11.42±3.08)d,P<0.01];手术后,观察组血清ICAM-1为(8.08±2.13)ng/ml,显著低于对照组[(13.27±2.60)ng/ml,P<0.01],MMP-13为(113.65±21.92)ng/ml,显著低于对照组[(171.02±27.85)ng/ml,P<0.01],降钙素原(PCT)为(7.23±0.74)μg/L,显著低于对照组[(11.24±1.53)μg/L,P<0.01],IL-6为(11.49±2.78)pg/L,显著低于对照组[(19.06±3.27)pg/L,P<0.01],Ig A为(2.63±0.46)g/L,显著高于对照组[(1.49±0.41)g/L,P<0.01],Ig M为(1.92±0.33)g/L,显著高于对照组[(1.40±0.27)g/L,P<0.01],Ig G为(9.72±1.53)g/L,显著高于对照组[(6.40±0.85)g/L,P<0.01];观察组并发症发生率(12.8%)明显低于对照组(42.5%,P<0.05);两组患者术后1 a、2 a和3 a生存率比较,均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论LLLR能明显降低左外叶HCC患者的手术创伤,减少术后并发症,而对患者生存率无明显影响。 Objective To compare laparoscopic left hepatic resection (LLLR) and laparoscopic left hepatic resection (OLLR) in treatment of patients with left lateral lobe hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods 94 patients with left lateral HCC in our hospital between April 2011 and June 2013 were recruited in this study, and they were randomly divided into control and observation group,with 47 cases in each group. The patients in control group received OLLR,and those in observation group were treated with LLLR. Serum ICAM-1,MMP-13 and IL-6 levels were detected by ELISA. All patients were followed-up for 3 years,and the survival rates at 1 year,2 years and 3 years after operation were recorded. Results The amount of bleeding in the observation group was (134.94±23.51) ml,significantly lower than in the control group [(290.18±30.76) ml,P〈0.01],eating after operation was (2.29±0.51) d,significantly shorter than in the control group [(3.80±0.87) d,P〈0.01], hospitalization stay was (7.43±2.39) d,significantly shorter than in the control group [(11.42±3.08) d,P〈0.01];serum ICAM-1 levels after operation in observation group was (8.08±2.13) ng/ml,significantly lower than in the control group [(3.27±2.60) ng/ml,P〈0.01],MMP-13 was (113.65±21.92) ng/ml,significantly lower than in the control group [(171.02±27.85) ng/ml,P〈0.01],PCT was (7.23±0.74) g/L,significantly lower than in the controlnbsp;group [(11.24±1.53) g/L,P〈0.01],IL-6 was (11.49±2.78) pg/L, significantly lower than in the control group [(19.06±3.27) pg/L,P〈0.01];serum IgA,IgM and IgG levels were significantly higher than in the control group (P〈0.01);the incidence of complica-tions in the observation group (12.8%) was signifi-cantly lower than in the control group (42.5%,P〈0.05);there was no significant difference as respect to the survival rates between the two groups in three year follow-up. Conclusion LLLR is an alternative approaches in the treatment of patie
出处 《实用肝脏病杂志》 CAS 2017年第4期451-454,共4页 Journal of Practical Hepatology
关键词 肝细胞癌 腹腔镜左肝外切除术 开腹左肝外切除术 并发症 生存率 Hepatoma Laparoscopic left hepatic resection Laparoscopic left hepatic resection Complication Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献93

共引文献161

同被引文献46

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部