期刊文献+

替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西他赛对姑息切除胃癌患者近期疗效分析 被引量:1

S-1,oxaliplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy combined with palliative surgery in treatment of patients with gastric cancer:an analysis of short-term effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西他赛对姑息切除胃癌患者术后疗效。方法:收集某院资料完整的姑息切除胃癌患者83例,根据患者接受治疗方案不同分为2组。替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西他赛组(治疗组,42例):术后25 d左右开始替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西他赛化疗。多西他赛联合奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶的单纯化疗组(对照组,41例)。2组患者一个疗程均21 d,并在3个疗程后检查评估各组化疗效果及毒性反应。结果:有效率和疾病控制率治疗组患者为68.4%和86.8%,显著高于对照组43.6%和61.5%。不良反应骨髓抑制、口腔溃疡、恶心呕吐、手足综合征等发生率治疗组患者显著低于对照组。结论:替吉奥联合奥沙利铂及多西他赛化疗对晚期姑息切除胃癌患者不仅有较好的疗效,不良反应发生率较低,且无较严重不良反应。治疗效果优于多西他赛联合奥沙利铂及氟尿嘧啶的单纯化疗方案。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of S-l, oxaliplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy combined with palliative surgery in treatment of patients with gastric cancer. Methods : 83 cases of gastric cancer with different treatments were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to different regimens:the S-1, oxaliplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy treatment group (treatment group, 42 cases ) , and the fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and doeetaxel chemotherapy treatment group (control group,41 cases). Chemotheraphy was given about 25 clays after operation. The cycle was repeated every 21 days. Clinical efficacy and toxicity were observed after 3 cycles. Results:The clinical effective rate and disease control rate (68.4% ; 86.8% ) of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group ( 43.6% ; 61.5 % , P 〈 0.05 ). The incidence of adverse reactions such as myelosuppression, dental ulcer, hand-foot syndrome, nausea and vomiting of the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group. Conclusion:The regimen of palliative surgery combined with S-1, oxalip]atin and docetaxel chemotherapy in treatment of gastric cancer shows high clinical efficacy and less toxicity.
作者 邓晓兰
出处 《淮海医药》 CAS 2017年第4期407-409,共3页 Journal of Huaihai Medicine
关键词 胃肿瘤 替吉奥 奥沙利铂 多西他赛 药物疗法 Gastric cancer S-1 Oxaliplatin Doeetaxel Drug treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献55

  • 1Yoshifumi Baba,Masayuki Watanabe,Naoya Yoshida,Hideo Baba.Neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2014,6(5):121-128. 被引量:17
  • 2Cunningham D,Allum WH,Stenning SP,菅鑫妍.手术期间化学疗法与单独手术治疗可切除的胃食管癌疗效比较[J].中国处方药,2006,5(8):59-60. 被引量:434
  • 3Schlag P. Randomized study of preoperative chemotherapy in squa-mous cellcancer of the esophagus CAO Esophageal Cancer Study Group[J].{H}CHIRURG,1992,(09):709-714. 被引量:1
  • 4Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oe-sophageal cancer:a randomised control ed trial[J].{H}LANCET,2002,(9319):1727-1733. 被引量:1
  • 5Tercioti Junior V,Lopes LR,Coelho Neto Jde S. Local effec-tiveness and complications of neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cellcarcinoma:radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy[J].Rev Col Bras Cir,2011,(04):227-234. 被引量:1
  • 6Law S,Fok M,Chow S. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cellcarcinoma of the esopha-gus:a prospective randomized trial[J].{H}Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon,1997,(02):210-217. 被引量:1
  • 7Thal inger CM,Kiesewetter B,Raderer M. Pre-and postop-erative treatment modalities for esophageal squamous cellcarcino-ma[J].{H}Anticancer Research,2012,(11):4609-4627. 被引量:1
  • 8Kelsen DP,Winter KA,Gunderson LL. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911(USA Intergroup 113):a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy fol owed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer[J].{H}Journal of Clinical Oncology,2007,(24):3719-3725. 被引量:1
  • 9Saeki H,Morita M,Nakashima Y. Neoadjuvant chemoradio-therapy for clinical stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ esophageal squamous cellcarcino-ma[J].{H}Anticancer Research,2011,(09):3073-3077. 被引量:1
  • 10Almhanna K,Strosberg JR. Multimodality approach for local y ad-vanced esophageal cancer[J].{H}World Journal of Gastroenterology,2012,(40):5679-5687. 被引量:1

共引文献84

同被引文献7

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部