摘要
实现国家治理现代化,建立以决策问责为核心的责任政府是关键。然而,当前中国以责任政府建设为目标的问责实践却呈现出"重执行、轻决策"的特征,对决策失误缺乏有效的责任追究,造成了决策失误多发与决策问责缺乏并存的现象。从主体与责任的视角观察,造成这一现象的根本原因有两个方面:一是决策责任主体的多元性形成了主体间的内在张力,导致责任追究中的"多只手难题";二是决策责任类型的多样性形成了各责任类型的不同适用情形,导致责任追究中的"多责任混乱"。对此,应当以明晰公共决策的责任主体和明确公共决策的责任类型为着力点,在厘清集体决策责任与个人决策责任界限的基础上,通过建立科学的决策责任终身追究制度和责任倒查机制,实现决策问责制度的优化重构。
It is the key to establish a responsible government with decision-making accountability as its core,which in order to realize the modernization of state governance.However,the current accountability practice for responsible government construction has presented the characteristics of'attention to implement and despise to decision-making',and the lack of effective accountability for decision-making mistakes has led to co-existence of decision-making errors frequently and decision-making accountability scantly.From the perspective of subject and responsibility,the root cause of this phenomenon has two aspects:first,the diversity of decision-making responsibility subject formed internal tension between subjects,which leading to the'multiple hands puzzle'in accountability;second,the diversity of decision-making responsibility type formed the different application of each type,which leading to'multiple accountabilities disorder'in accountability.In this regard,it should focus on clear the responsibility subjects and types of decision-making,and on the basis of clarify the limits between collective and personal decision-making responsibility,then though the establishment of scientific lifelong responsibility accounting system and retrospective mechanism to realize the optimization and reconstruction of decision-making accountability system.
出处
《政治学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期52-62,共11页
CASS Journal of Political Science
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目"重大决策终身责任追究制度及责任倒查机制研究"(15CZZ028)的研究成果
关键词
决策问责
责任主体
责任类型
终身追究
责任倒查
decision-making accountability
responsibility subject
responsibility type
lifelong responsibility accounting
responsibility retrospective
