摘要
在金岳霖的《论道》形上体系之中,"幾"表示"能"之"即出即入"于"可能",是世界将要变动而未变动的那个时刻。"数"相待于"幾",表示"能"之"会出会入"于"可能",即变动的总会发生。"幾不可测"而"数可先知",表明"幾"不可知而"数"可知;就相关于个体的幾和数即"运"和"命"而言,"运可改造"而"命不可逃",表明个体之幾是行动的对象,而个体之数不是。因此,个体就陷入"知而不行"和"行而不知"的两重困境之中,而这两重困境是同时发生和不可调和的。这使得《论道》为知行的分离提供了一种新的形上论证。
In the metaphysical system of Jin Yuelin＇s Lun Dao, Ji refers, on the one hand, to the moment when Neng joins itself into Keneng. It is also the moment when change emerges. On the other hand, Shu refers to the inevitability that Neng joins in, which indicates that changes have to happen. Ji is unknowable while Shu is predictable. Yun as Ji in an individual is changeable while Ming as Shu in an individual is inevitable. Thus an individual falls into the situation in which he both does without knowing and knows without doing accordingly. He is simultaneously trapped in the two difficulties. This confirms a discrepancy between one＇s knowledge and behaviour and even provides a metaphysical justification of the discrepancy.
出处
《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第3期75-79,共5页
Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)
关键词
金岳霖
幾
数
知行
Jin Yuelin
Ji
Shu
knowing and doing
