摘要
从规范层面看,我国刑事诉讼法对电子数据的搜查并未做明确规定,电子数据提交原则以"原始载体说"为主。基于裁判文书的实证分析显示,实践中对电子数据的提取主要以勘验、检查、鉴定的形式进行,但这些控权较为宽松的取证措施并不能承担起公民隐私权益保护的重任;实践中以书面形式代替电子证据"原件"展示的做法,实质上限制了被告方辩护权的行使。完善电子数据搜查制度和展示制度,完善非法证据排除规则和最佳证据规则等在电子取证中的运用,应是未来电子证据制度改革的重点。
In terms of norms, the prescription of electronic evidence collection in China＇s Criminal Procedure Law is not clear and the submit principle of electronic data is based on the theory of primary carrier. The empirical analysis of judicial adjudicative documents shows that electronic evidence collection is carried on by means of examination, inspection and appraisal. However, these loose means of electronic evidence collection can not fulfill the liability of protecting citizens＇privacy. In judicial practice, the method of substituting electronic evidence script with written forms actually confines the execution of the accused person＇s right to defense. The improvement of electronic evidence collection system and display system and the improvement of excluding principles of illegal evidence applied in the process of electronic evidence collection shall be the focal points of future electronic evidence collection system reform.
出处
《政法学刊》
2017年第1期79-89,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"中国特色社会主义司法制度的模式
规律与改革方向研究"(14AKS009)
关键词
互联网
电子数据
取证规则
司法控制
Interact
electronic data
principles of evidence Collection
judicial control
