摘要
1912年8月至9月间,孙中山为调停南北党争北上会晤袁世凯,并在此期间抛出了迁都的意见,随即引发了各大报刊的论战。反对迁都者从保全满蒙、维护条约制度、现实财政困窘等因素,重申了定都北京的必要性;支持迁都者则认为定都北京乃袁世凯拥兵自重的借口,唯迁都南京方可达防范外敌侵略、摆脱清旧势力魔窟等目标。事实上,迁都之争的背后,体现的是诸报所代表党派的利益诉求,以及各自同袁世凯政府、孙中山之间的关系。而迁都之议最终的搁置,不仅是政党势力博弈的结果,而且展现了南北关系的整合与变动。
From August to September in 1912, Sun Yat-Sen departed to Beijing and had an appointment with Yuan Shi- kai. The viewpoint on the migration of capital proposed by Sun Yat-Sen triggered debates among various newspapers. Opponents reaf{irmed the necessity of Beijing with several factors such as preservation of Manchu and Mongolian, uphold the treaty regimes, and fiscal stress. Supporter argued that establishing capital in Beij[ng is an excuse of Yuan Shi-kai to control the armed forces,and moving to Nanjing is the only way to resist foreign invasion and get rid of the old forces. It reflected demands and relationship between multiple parties. The discussion was shelved ultimately was the consequence of integration of political forces.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期68-74,共7页
Journal of Historical Science
关键词
民国元年
孙中山
袁世凯
迁都论争
1912
Sun Yat-SemYuan Shi-kai
the controversy over migration of the capital
