摘要
目的对循证护理应用于急性心肌梗死后心律失常患者中的效果以及对患者的影响进行分析研究。方法选取116例2014年5月—2017年2月在我院接受治疗的急性心肌梗死后心律失常患者,并1:1随机分为参照组(接受常规护理)和实验组(接受循证护理)各58例,对两种不同护理模式的效果进行对照研究。结果平均卧床时间、平均住院时间方面,实验组患者均短于参照组;平均住院费用方面,实验组患者少于参照组;心律失常发生率方面,实验组患者低于参照组(3.45%vs.24.14%),组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论循证护理应用于急性心肌梗死后心律失常患者中的效果十分理想。
Objective Analysis on evidence-based nursing effect and its influence on patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction. Methods Chose 116 patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction who were treated in hospital from May 2014 to February 2017 to study and separated them into control group （normal nursing） and study group （evidence-based nursing） according to 1： 1 ratio with 58 patients in each group, and then make a comparative study on nursing effects between two groups. Results Patients＇ bed-rest time and hospitalization time on average and their treatment expense in study group were much less than counterparts in control group and patients＇ arrhythmia incidence in study group was much lower than that in control group （3.45% vs, 24.14%）; there were differentials between two groups and such differentials had statistic value （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Applying evidence-based nursing to patients with arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction is quite favorable and effective.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第10期167-168,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
循证护理
急性心肌梗死
心律失常
evidence-based nursing
acute myocardial infarction
arrhythmia
