期刊文献+

非寡转移Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌化疗同期胸部三维放疗预后分析 被引量:8

Prognostic analysis of chemotherapy with concurrent three-dimensional radiotherapy for non-oligometastatic Stage Ⅳ NSCLC
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的非寡转移Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者能否从原发肿瘤放疗中获益尚不明确,本研究旨在探讨非寡转移Ⅳ期NSCLC患者化疗同期胸部三维适形放疗(3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy,3DCRT)的疗效及预后影响因素。方法选取2003-01-23-2012-05-13贵州省肿瘤医院404例患者参加两项前瞻性临床研究。入组标准:(1)初诊的且经组织病理学或细胞学确诊为NSCLC;(2)年龄18~80岁;(3)KPS评分≥70;(4)接受≥2个周期化疗且整个病程中未接受分子靶向治疗;(5)胸部原发肿瘤接受3DCRT或调强放疗(intensity modulated radiation therapy,IMRT);(6)胸部原发肿瘤接受放疗剂量≥36Gy。寡转移定义为转移病灶<5个,非寡转移定义为转移病灶≥5个。主要采用以铂类为基础的两药联合化疗。Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率,Log-rank法组间比较及单因素预后分析,Cox模型行多因素预后分析。结果符合入组标准的274例患者为研究对象,其中183例为非寡转移患者。中位生存时间为13.0个月(95%CI为11.9~14.1),1、2和3年总生存率(overall survival,OS)分别为50.7%、15.8%和9.1%;原发肿瘤放疗剂量≥63Gy的1、2和3年OS率为55.3%、22.7%和17.0%,<63Gy的1、2和3年OS率为46.5%、9.3%和2.5%,χ~2=11.497,P<0.001;寡转移患者的1、2和3年OS率分别为59.3%、22.0%和15.2%,非寡转移患者的1、2和3年OS率分别为46.4%、12.7%和6.0%,χ~2=5.741,P=0.017。寡转移(χ~2=7.571、P=0.006)和非寡转移(χ~2=8.242、P=0.004)患者分别进行分析,原发肿瘤放疗剂量≥63Gy仍是影响总生存的因素。非寡转移患者多因素分析显示,原发肿瘤放疗剂量、原发肿瘤体积、化疗疗效达及治疗后KPS是影响总生存的独立因素。亚组分析显示,化疗有效(完全缓解和部分缓解)的非寡转移患者,原发肿瘤放疗剂量≥63Gy是影响生存的因素(χ~2=4.419,P=0.036);化疗有效和无效的非寡转移患者,原发肿瘤放疗剂量≥63Gy与<63Gy的总� OBJECTIVE The role of radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy has not been well established in non-oligometastatic Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate overall survival (OS) of non-oligometastatic NSCLC treated with chemotherapy with concurrent radiation to the primary tumor. METHODS From January 23, 2003 to May 13, 2012. Totally 404 patients were enrolled in two prospective studies. Totally, 274 eligible patients were screened from these two prospective studies. Main eligible criteria were as follows: (1) histologically or cytology confirmed NSCLC; (2) age 18-80 years; (3) a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥70; (4) received at least two chemotherapy cycles, and did not receive targeted therapy or immunotherapy during lifetime, (5) using modern radiation technique (3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy [3DCRT] or intensity modulated radiation therapy [IM- RT]); (6) a thoracic radiation dose of at least 36 Gy. Oligometastatic and non-oligometastatic NSCLC were defined as having 〈 5 and ≥5 metastatic lesions, respectively. Prognostic factors for OS were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Totally 274 eligible patients were included in this study, 183 had non-oligometastatic disease. The median OS time for all patients was 13.0 months (95% CI: 11.9-14.1), and the OS rates were 50.7% at 1 year, 15.8% at 2 years, and 9.1% at 3 years. OS rates for patients who had received ≥63 Gy thoracic radiation therapy were 55.3% at 1 year, 22.7% at 2 years, and 17.0% at 3 years. Corresponding rates for those who received ~63 Gy were 46.5%, 9.3%, and 2.5% (χ^2= 11. 497, P〈0. 001). Comparison of OS in patients with oligometastatic disease versus those with non- oligometastatic disease, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 59. 3%, 22.0% and 15.2% vs 46.4%, 12.7% and 6.0% (χ^2=5. 741, P=0. 017). When all patients were subdivided into patients with oligometastase (χ^2= 7. 571 ,P= 0. 006)
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第5期322-327,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 贵州省应用基础研究计划重大专项[黔科合J重大字(2015)2003] 贵州省教育厅创新群体重大研究项目[黔教合KY字(2016)032] 贵州地区常见疾病的临床研究[黔科合SY字(2014)3021]
关键词 非小细胞肺/同期化放疗法 放射疗法 三维 Ⅳ期 非寡转移 carcinoma, non-small cell lung/concurrent chemoradiotherapy radiotherapy, three-dimensional Stage Ⅳ non-oligometastases
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years :analysis of the surveillance,epidemiologic,and end results database.J Clin ,2006,24:4539-4544. 被引量:1
  • 2Ramalingam S, Belani CP. State-of-the-art chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin 0ncol,2004,31:68- 74. 被引量:1
  • 3Morgensztem D, Waqar S, Subramanian J, et al. Improving survival for stage 1V non-small cell lung cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results survey from 1990 to 2005. J Clin Onco1,2009,4 : 1524-1529. 被引量:1
  • 4Kramer GW, Wanders SL, Noordijk EM, et al. Results of the Dutch national study of the palliative effect of irradiation using two different treatment schemes for non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Onco1,2005 ,23 :2962-2970. 被引量:1
  • 5Fang LC, Komaki R, Allen P, et al. Comparison for patients with medically inoperable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer treated with two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ,2006,66 : 108-116. 被引量:1
  • 6Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med ,2002,346:92-98. 被引量:1
  • 7Kelly K, Crowley J, Bunn PA, et al. Randomized phase HI trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a southwest oncology group trial. J Clin Oncol,2001,19: 3210- 3218. 被引量:1
  • 8Postmus PE, Brambilla E, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project : proposals for revision of the M descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac 0ncol,2007,2:686-593. 被引量:1
  • 9Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project:proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumors. J Thorac Oncol, 2007, 2 : 706- 714. 被引量:1
  • 10Scagliotti GV, De Marinis F, Rinaldi M, et al. Phase m randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2002,20: 4285-4291. 被引量:1

共引文献23

同被引文献80

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部