摘要
目的探讨不同静脉采血方法下血液样本溶血的发生率及减少溶血发生的护理方法 ,为临床提高血液采样的有效性提供借鉴和参考。方法方便选取2016年1月—2017年1月于该院行静脉采血的260例患者为研究对象,根据采血方法不同将入选病例分为A组(真空采血法,86例)、B组(采血针连接静脉留置针采血法,87例)和C组(注射器连接静脉留置针采血法,87例)。3组静脉采血均严格按照护理相关规程进行操作,样本采集到以后即刻送检。对比观察3组样本的溶血发生情况。结果 A组患者发生溶血者有2例,其发生率2.33%,B组发生溶血有8例患者,其发生率为9.20%,C组发生溶血的患者有14例,其发生率为16.09%,A组溶血发生率显著低于B组和C组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论单纯以真空采血管进行采血的溶血发生率最低。采血过程中,通过护理人员的规范化护理操作,能进一步降低溶血发生几率,提高血液样本有效性。
Objective To discuss the incidence rate of blood samples hemolysis in different venous blood collection methods and nursing method of reducing the occurrence of hemolysis and provide reference for the clinical improvement of effectiveness of blood sampling. Methods 260 cases of patients with venous blood collection in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2017 were convenient selected and divided into two groups according to different blood collection methods, the group A with 86 cases adopted the vacuum tube for blood collection, the group B with 87 cases adopted the blood taking needle and venous indwelling needle, and the group C with 87 cases adopted the injector and venous indwelling needle, and the three groups conducted the operation strictly according to the nursing related procedures, and the samples were submitted immediately after collection, and the occurrence of hemolysis of the three groups was observed. Results In the group A,the incidence rate of hemolysis was obviously lower than that in the group B and group C(2 cases, 2.33% vs 8 cases, 9.20%,14 cases, 16.09%), and the differences between groups were statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The incidence rate of hemolysis of simple vacuum blood collection tube is lowest, and in the blood collection course, the standardized nursing operation of nursing staff can further reduce the occurrence probability of hemolysis and improve the effectiveness of blood samples.
出处
《中外医疗》
2017年第12期150-152,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
静脉采血
溶血
护理
Venous blood collection
Hemolysis
Nursing
