期刊文献+

焦菊隐“心象说”与斯氏体系关系二题 被引量:3

Two Issues of Relationship between JIAO Ju-yin's Theory of “Inner Image” and Stanislavski's System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有学者称焦菊隐的"心象说"对斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基表演体系存在误解,"心象说"应该看作焦菊隐综合体验、表现及中国传统戏曲理论的结果,然而,通过考察焦菊隐研读斯氏著作的史实,并将焦菊隐所论与斯氏相关著述对读,可以看出:焦菊隐所说"在你生活于角色之前,首先使角色生活于你"虽非斯氏原话,但也不是随意杜撰;而焦菊隐对斯氏《演员自我修养》第二部有关"性格化"的理解,恰与斯氏手稿之言不谋而合。焦菊隐的"心象说"并未违背斯氏体系精神,只是在方法层面上有所不同,故与其说焦菊隐的"心象说"是综合三家之说的产物,不如说是斯氏表演体系的中国变体。 Some people hold that JIAO Ju-yin's interpretation of the theory of "Inner Image" is not equivalent to, and has some misapprehensions about, the original concept in Stanislavski's system. They advocate that JIAO's theory should be viewed as a mixture of the "art of experiencing", the "art of representation", and also the experiences of Chinese traditional opera performances. However, JIAO had a careful study of Stanislavski's works. While comparing the works of both art- ists, it can be concluded that JIAO's idea maintains consistency with Stanislavski's theory. In fact, JIAO has once stated that "before you experience the role, let the role experience you". This view is not something arbitrary: it is an interpretation of Stanislavski's theory from some other approaches and perspectives. Therefore, it might not be accurate to regard his theory of "Inner Image" merely as a product developing from the "art of experiencing" and the "art of representation", and this pa- per intends to argue that his theory should actually be a flexible variation of Stanislavski's system in the particular environ- ment of China.
作者 邹红
出处 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期12-18,共7页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词 焦菊隐 心象说 斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基 性格化 JIAO Ju-yin the theory of "Inner Image" Stanislavski characterization
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1焦菊隐著,杜澄夫编..焦菊隐戏剧散论[M].北京:中国戏剧出版社,1985:504.
  • 2苏民等著..论焦菊隐导演学派[M].北京:文化艺术出版社,1985:224.
  • 3姜涛..中国演剧学习实践斯氏体系讲略[M].北京:文化艺术出版社,2012:458.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部