摘要
因果关系切断说认为,共犯关系的消解的唯一判断标准是,是否消解了自己先前的参与所给予的因果性影响。因此,在判断是否需要采取结果避免措施之际,不是考虑着手实行之前还是着手实行之后这种形式性区别,而应关注共谋的内容是否已经被部分现实化,并由此形成了容易以此为前提继续实施犯罪的状况。不过,即便没有消解因果关系,倘若共谋者通过一定努力,消除了自己的参与行为的重要性,或者消除了与其他参与者之间的共同性,该共谋者就从共同正犯降格至帮助犯。另外,被其他共犯单方面地排除在共犯关系之外,这不过是意味着排除了自此之后的心理的、物理的因果性,但并不意味着切断了先前的参与所具有的因果性影响。
The cut-off causal relationship theory refers the only judgement standard of comphcity＇s ehmination to whether the accomplice eliminates the causal influence of his former behavior or not. Therefore, when judging whether the accomplice should take prevention actions, the formal difference between before initiating a crime and after is not a concern. We should focus on whether the content of collusion has been partly realized. It could thus form the situation of continuing to implement the crime under this premise. However, if the accomphce endeavors to ehminate the importance of his participative behavior or the communality with other accomplice, the accomplice could become aider rather than joint offender, even though the causal relationship is not ehminated. Besides, being unilaterally left out of complicity by other accomplice just means that the mental and physical causal relationship has been eliminated. It, however, does not mean that the causality has been cut-off between the influence and his former behavior.
作者
王昭武(译)
Hashizume Takashi Wang Zhao-wu
出处
《苏州大学学报（法学版）》
2016年第4期121-133,共13页
Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition
关键词
共犯关系的消解
因果关系切断说
心理因果性
物理因果性
共谋的射程
Elimination of Complicity
The Cut-off Causal Relationship Theory
Mental Causation
Physical Causation
Range of Collusion
