期刊文献+

氨磺必利与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症疗效及安全性对照研究 被引量:3

Efficacy and safety of amisulpride and risperidone in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较氨磺必利与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症的疗效及安全性。方法将82例首发精神分裂症患者按照随机数字表法分为两组,观察组给予氨磺必利治疗,对照组给予利培酮治疗。观察8周。于治疗前后采用阳性与阴性症状量表评定临床疗效,国际医学组织理事会推荐的分级标准统计不良反应发生率。结果治疗2周末起两组阳性与阴性症状量表总分均较治疗前显著降低(P〈0.01);同期两组间比较,治疗前差异无显著性(P〉0.05),治疗后观察组显著低于对照组(P〈0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为20.5%,对照组为45.0%,观察组垃著低于对照组(P〈0.01)。结论氨磺必利治疗首发精神分裂症疗效显著,安全性高,优于利培酮治疗。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of amisulpride and risperidone in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia. Methods Eighty-two first-episode schizophrenics were assigned to two groups according to random number table, observation group was treated with amisulpride, and control group with risperidone for 8 weeks. Efficacies were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) before and after treatment and the incidences of adverse reactions counted according to grading criteria recommended by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Results Since the end of the 2^nd week treatment the total PANSS scores of both groups lowered more significantly compared with pretreatment (P 〈 0.01) ; pretreatment group differences weren't significant (P〉 0.05 ) and those were significantly lower in observation than in control group (P〈0.05). The incidence of ad verse reactions was respectively 20.5 % in observation and 45.0% in control group and the former significantly lower than the latter (P〈0.01). Conclusion Amisulpride has an evident effect and higher safety compared with risperidone in first-episode schizophrenia.
作者 张俊丽
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2017年第2期48-49,55,共3页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词 氨磺必利 利培酮 精神分裂症 阳性与阴性症状量表 疗效 安全性 Amisulpride risperidone schizophrenia PANSS efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献78

  • 1黄继伟,吕维忠,何益群.氨磺必利与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症对照研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2013,19(4):343-313. 被引量:39
  • 2翟金国,赵靖平,房茂胜.新型非典型抗精神病药临床应用评价[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2006,25(4):296-301. 被引量:42
  • 3张明园.精神科评定量表手册.精神卫生评定量表[M].湖南科学技术出版社,1989.120-150. 被引量:13
  • 4李凌江.生活质量综合评定问卷-74[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2000,:88-92. 被引量:1
  • 5中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].第3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004:75. 被引量:17
  • 6张明圆.精神科评定量表手册[M]第2版.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1998.16-27. 被引量:74
  • 7中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第三版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2000:75-78. 被引量:4
  • 8Scatton B, Claustre Y, Cudenner A, et al. Amisulpride : from animal pharmacology to therapeutic action [ J ]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 1997,12 (2) :29 - 36. 被引量:1
  • 9Perrault G, Depoortere R, Morel E, et al. Psychopharmacolo - gical profile of amisulpride: an antipsychotic drug with presynaptic D2/D3 dopamine receptor antagonist activity and limbic selectivity [ J ]. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1997,280 : 73 - 82. 被引量:1
  • 10Peuskcns J, Bech P, Miler HL, et al. Amisulpride vs. risper - idone in the treatment of acute exacerbotions of schizophrenia [ J ]. Amisulpride Study Group. Psychiatry Res, 1999,88 : 107 - 117. 被引量:1

共引文献144

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部