摘要
目的：对比分析外固定支架与锁定加压钢板治疗桡骨远端C型骨折的临床疗效.方法：选取2014年6月-2015年6月在我院接受治疗的80例桡骨远端C型骨折患者作为研究对象.将患者随机分成观察组、对照组,每组各40例患者,其中观察组采用外固定支架进行治疗,对照组采用锁定加压钢板进行治疗.以2组患者并发症发生情况、骨折愈合时间、住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量为观察指标.结果：2组患者经过相应的治疗,观察组患者恢复情况明显优于对照组,并在术后随访1年,经过相应检查得出观察组患者并发症发生率为7.5%,明显低于对照组发生率12.5%.且2组差异P〈0.05,具有统计学意义.结论：通过治疗可以看出,2组患者均取得了良好的临床效果,但总体上外固定支架略优于锁定加压钢板治疗,值得临床推广.
Objective：Comparative Analysis of the external fixator and clinical effect of locking compression plate in treatment of type C distal radius fractures.Methods：from June 2014 to June 2015 in our hospital treated 80 cases of type C distal radius fractures in patients as research subjects.The patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group,40 patients in each group,observation group were treated with external fixator and the control group were treated with locking compression plate.In the case of the two groups were complications,fracture healing time,hospital stay,operative time,blood loss was observed.Results：The two groups of patients after appropriate treatment,recovery of the observation group were significantly better than the control group,and were followed up for 1 year after the respective inspection results observed in patients complication rate was 7.5%,significantly lower than the control group The incidence of 12.5%.And the difference was P 〈0.05,statistically significant.Conclusion：It could be seen through treatment,patients in both groups achieved good clinical results,but in general the external fixator should be slightly better than locking compression plate fixation,worthy of promotion.
出处
《中国伤残医学》
2017年第8期18-20,共3页
Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词
桡骨远端C型骨折
外固定支架
锁定加压钢板
C distal radius fractures
External fixation
Locking compression plate
