摘要
在诉讼的进行中转移诉讼标的会对整个诉讼进程产生很大的影响,比如引起诉讼承担、如何确定当事人等问题。所以,需要一定的规则来应对诉讼标的转移后所出现的各种问题。对此各国具体规定不一,主要有当事人恒定原则和诉讼承继原则两种诉讼规则。其中,我国《民诉法解释》第249条确立了当事人恒定原则,但是目前的司法解释存在漏洞并缺乏可操作性,需要进一步的修改与完善。本文结合域外立法中关于当事人恒定原则的规定,对我国的司法解释进行了分析并提出可行的完善建议。
In the process of litigation, transferring object of action will have a significant impact on proceedings and cause enormous problems, such as litigation succeeding,how to determine the parties and so on. Therefore, we need specific rules of law to deal with those problems. Different countries have distinct legislation, which are mainly divided into constant party doctrine and specific litigation succeeding system. According to the article 249 of our judicial interpretations of civil procedure law, we have established constant party principle. However, current judicial interpretations have some legal loopholes and lack operability, which need to be modified and perfect further. In combination with constant party doctrine in extraterritorial legislation, I have analyzed our judicial interpretations and put forward some feasible proposals to perfect current legislation in the paper.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2017年第2期23-27,59,共6页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
诉讼标的转移
当事人恒定原则
民诉法解释
transferring object of action
constant party doctrine
judicial interpretations of civil procedure law
