摘要
目的探讨甲状腺微小癌采用MRI、CT、B超三种检测方式对其诊断效果的对比分析。方法回顾分析我院在2013年9月至2015年7月进行诊治的资料齐全的180例甲状腺微小癌患者,所有患者均经过MRI、CT、B超三种检测方式对其诊断,诊断结果与病理学诊断结果进行对比,分别统计三种检测方式的甲状腺微小癌阳性率。结果本次研究中,甲状腺微小癌MRI的阳性率为32.22%(58/180)、CT的阳性率为33.89%(61/180)、B超的阳性率为74.44%(134/180),MRI与CT检测的阳性率之间相比,差异无显著性,无统计学意义(χ~2=0.11,P>0.05),MRI、CT与B超检测的阳性率之间相比,差异有显著性,有统计学意义(χ~2=64.46,P<0.01;χ~2=59.63,P<0.01)。结论甲状腺微小癌MRI、CT、B超三种检测方法中,B超检测的阳性率最高,对临床诊断具有很强的指导意义,值得临床上进行推广。
Objective To investigate the thyroid cancer using small MRI, CT, B ultrasonic three detection methods of comparative analysis of the effect of its diagnosis. Methods A retrospective analysis of our hospital in September 2013 to July 2015 for treatment of the information is complete 180 cases of thyroid cancer in patients with small, all patients were over three detection through MRI, CT, B patterns on their diagnosis, diagnosis and disease Neo diagnostic results were compared, respectively, the positive rate of thyroid lnicrocarcinoma statistics three detection modes, Results The remits of this study, tile tiny thyroid cancer MRI positive rate of 32.22% （58/181））, CT positive rate of 33.89% （61 / 180）, B super-positive rate of 74.44% （134/18（））, MRI between positive rate compared with CT, the difference was not statistically significant, was not statistically significant （ X 2=0.11, P〉0.05）, the difference was significant between, MRI, CT and B-positive rate of detection, there was statistically significant （ X 2=64.46, P〈0.01, X 2=59.63, P〈0.01）. Condulion Thyroid microcarcinoma of MRI, CT, B super three detection methods, the positive rate of B-test of the highest, has a strong guiding significance for clinical diagmosis, it is worth promotion clinically.
出处
《中国CT和MRI杂志》
2017年第5期43-44,77,共3页
Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
