摘要
环境史诞生之初,囿于现实问题的紧迫性,形成"问题史学"的撰史模式。受其支配,在自身的起源正名上表现为"环境问题催生说",研究内容上表现为以"生产方式"为主导的历史本体,价值评判上表现为"衰败论叙事"的历史认知。它们层层递进,互为因果,仍浸润于当下的环境史研究,尽管起初有其合理性,但随着环境史学科自觉意识的强化,其弊端日益明显。"环境问题催生说"的理论深度有待挖掘。"生产方式"的历史本体逐渐走向优化协同。"衰败论叙事"的历史认知需实现从"自然之死"向"工业有机体"的自我超越。秉承环境史固有的批判性,总结特征,剖析弊端,厘清环境史叙事范型的演变,绘制人与自然交互的总体画卷。
At the birth of environmental history,given the urgency of realistic issues,it formed a narrative paradigm of 'problematic history'that dominated its three characteristics. They are each other's essential prerequisites and present progressive layers of the process,still focus on the contemporary study of environmental history. Besides,they are rational originally,however,with the strengthen of discipline awareness and consciousness,the shortcomings of the three models are increasingly apparent. What's more,the study on interactions between man and nature is good for academic innovation.
出处
《史林》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期195-204,共10页
Historical Review
基金
国家社科基金项目"20世纪后期美国环境治理中工具性因素的作用异化研究"(批准号:11CSS006)的阶段性成果
