摘要
目的:探讨眼周脉冲治疗仪对眼顿挫外伤荧光眼底血管造影(FFA)术后不良反应的缓解效果。方法:选取医院收治的行眼底荧光血管造影的140例眼顿挫伤患者,将其依照数表法随机分为观察组和对照组,每组70例。对照组患者实施常规病情监测及护理干预,包括饮食干预、病情监测、配合干预与知识普及等;观察组在对照组常规干预的基础上应用智能型眼周脉冲治疗仪进行治疗。比较两组患者焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分情况以及不良反应和生活质量情况。结果:两组患者行眼周脉冲治疗仪干预前的SAS和SDS评分比较无差异,而干预后两组各项评分比较,差异均具统计学意义(t=4.324,t=5.915;P<0.05);观察组与对照组患者术后的发热、恶心呕吐及荨麻疹等不良反应相比较均较少出现,其差异具统计学意义(x^2=3.855,x^2=4.011,x^2=3.421;P<0.05);3观察组患者的强迫症状、敌对情绪评分、躯体性及人际关系等评分均比对照组有良好的表现,其差异有统计学意义(t=7.993,t=8.024,t=8.013,t=9.548;P<0.05)。结论:智能型眼周脉冲治疗仪联合常规护理干预可减少FFA术后的不良反应,并且效果显著,可以在临床推广应用。
Objective： To discuss the relieved effect of eye pulse treatment instrument for postoperative adverse reaction of fluorescence fundus angiography（FFA）. Methods： 140 patients with eye blunt trauma treated by fluorescence fundus angiography（FFA） were divided into observation group（70 cases） and control group（70 cases） as random table method. The patients of control group were carried out routine illness monitoring and nursing intervention, included diet intervention, illness monitoring, match up intervention and knowledge popularization and so on. The patients of observation group were treated by using eye pulse treatment instrument combined with the treatment measures of control group. To compare the scores situation of self-rating anxiety scale（SAS） and self-rating depression scale（SDS）, adverse reaction and quality of life between the two groups. Results： There was no significant differences about SAS and SDS, respectively, between the two groups before intervention. After intervention, there was significant differences about SAS and SDS, respectively, between the two groups（t=4.324, t=5.915; P〈0.05）. The series postoperative adverse reaction of observation group, fever, nausea and vomiting, and urticaria, was significant less than those of control group, respectively（x^2=3.855, x^2=4.011, x^2=3.421; P〈0.05）. The obsessive-compulsive symptom, hostility scores, somatization and the interpersonal relationships of patients in observation group, respectively, was better than those in control group, and all of these differences between them were significant（t=7.993, t=8.024, t=8.013, t=9.548; P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The combinative treatment measure of intelligent eye pulse treatment instrument and routine nursing can reduce the post-operative adverse reaction of fluorescence fundus angiography and its effect is significant. Therefore, this measure is worthy in clinical popularization and application.
出处
《中国医学装备》
2017年第4期114-117,共4页
China Medical Equipment
关键词
智能型眼周脉冲治疗仪
护理干预
眼外伤
眼底荧光血管造影
Intelligent eye pulse treatment instrument
Nursing intervention
Eye traumas
Fluorescence fundus angiography
