摘要
从学术严谨性的角度讲,"公众史学"和"公共史学"这两个概念不应是可以随意互换的,其内涵定义和外延的界定都应有所区别,否则便沦为了一字之差的词汇游戏。所谓"公共史学",应当是特指美国的"Public History",而"公众史学"客观产生及存在的历史渊源,实际上远远超越了公共史学,为此其所形成的定义不仅有别于后者,涵盖也自然是应大于后者的。当然21世纪的今天,随着社会的进步,公众史学在公共史学的启发下,也应进入高校历史专业的殿堂并引起专业史学家的关注和参与,从而能够成为历史学的新兴分支学科,尤其是在拥有数千年历史传统的中国。故尔,有必要对两者的区别作些探讨,予以厘清。
From the perspective of academic rigor,in Chinese cot/text, the two concepts of ＂Gong Zhong Shi Xue＂ （public historyⅡ ） and ＂Gong Gong Shi Xue＂ （public history Ⅰ ） should not be freely interchange- able due to their different connotations and extensions otherwise they will become a vocabulary game of on- ly one different word. The so-called ＂Gong Gong Shi Xue＂（public history Ⅰ ） should be specifically refers to the ＂Public History＂ in the United States, while ＂Gong Zhong Shi Xue＂（public history Ⅱ ） is far beyond it in the historical origins whose definition is not only different from it and the coverage is naturally greater than it. Of course, with the progress of society in the 21st century, ＂Gong Zhong Shi Xue＂（public history Ⅱ ） ,under the inspiration of ＂ Gong Gong Shi Xue＂ （public history Ⅰ ） Public History in the United States, should also enter the halls of the history specialty of colleges and universities and attract the atten- tion and participation of professional historians to become a new branch of history, especially in China, which has a history of thousands of years. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the difference between the two concepts.
出处
《徐州工程学院学报（社会科学版）》
2017年第2期55-58,共4页
Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition
基金
中国社会科学院创新工程项目"新世纪以来西方史学理论前沿问题研究"(WS09_2016_SCX_1704)阶段性成果
关键词
史学理论
公众史学
公共史学
historiography
Gong Zhong Shi Xue
Gong Gong Shi Xue
public history
