期刊文献+

关于企业期限错配的机理和财务危机的研究 被引量:2

The Research on the Mechanism of Enterprise Term Mismatch and the Financial Crisis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国现有的商业银行贷款期限结构错配及不完善的债券市场约束条件下,众多企业无法解决债务期限错配的困境。中国企业发生流动性危机而最终破产,究其原因是其采取的"期限错配"经营模式所引致的流动性风险未被正确地定价并进行补偿。我们基于商业银行利差决定模型和"中国企业宏观数据及央行1000户破产企业问卷调查数据",对企业期限错配的内在机理进行分析,并在模型推导结论的基础上,构建用于度量企业期限错配的相关代理指标进行实证研究。从理论和实证的方法探讨了企业期限错配的机理和破产企业遭遇财务危机的内在原因——期限错配,并对如何解决银企贷款期限错配的危害性提出了相应的合理化纠错策略。 In the constraints of China' s current commercial bank loan term structure mismatch and imperfect bond market, many companies cannot solve the plight of the debt maturity mismatch. At present, the reason that China' s enterprises have problems in liq- uidity crisis and are bankrupt finally is that the liquidity risk caused by their adopting the term mismatch business model has not been properly priced and compensated. Based on commercial banks ' interest margins determination model and "China enterprise macroe- conomic data and central bank 1000 bankrupt enterprises survey data", the paper analyzes the intrinsic mechanism of enterprise term mismatch, and makes an empirical study on related proxy indexes of measuring enterprise term mismatch on the basis of the model conclusion. The paper theoretically and empirically discusses the mechanism of enterprise term mismatch and the internal cause of the financial crisis of bankrupt enterprises, and proposes the corresponding rational error correction strategy on how to solve the harm problem of the mismatch between enterprises and banks.
出处 《西部金融》 2017年第2期8-15,20,共9页 West China Finance
关键词 期限错配 利差决定模型 期限结构 term mismatch interest margins determination model term structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1肖作平,李孔.《负债到期结构影响因素:理论和证据》[J],《证券市场导报》2004年第3期. 被引量:1
  • 2Anderson,T. W. and Hsiao. C. ,Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data[J].Journal of Econometrics 18, 1982,47-82. 被引量:1
  • 3Arellano, M. , and Bond . S. ,Some tests of specification for panel data[J].Review of Economic Studies 58,1991,277-297. 被引量:1
  • 4Arellano,M. , and Bond. S. , Dynamic panel data estimation using DPD-a guide for users, Institute for Fiscal studies[R].Working Paper ,1988, 88/15. 被引量:1
  • 5Barclay,M. J. , and Smith. Jr. , The maturity of corporate debt[J]. Journal of Finance 50, 1995,609-631. 被引量:1
  • 6Brick,I. E. , and Ravid, S. A. , On the relevance of debt maturity structure[J], Journal of Finance 40,1985, 1423-1437. 被引量:1
  • 7Fama,E. , and Jensen, M. C. , Agency Problem and Residual Claims[J].Journal of Law and Economics 26, 1983, 301-325. 被引量:1
  • 8Flannery, M. , Asymmetric information and risk debt maturity structure choice[J].Journal of Finance 41,1986, 18-38. 被引量:1
  • 9Gilson,S. , Transaction cost and capital structure choice: evidences from financially distressed firms[J].Journal of Finance 52,1997, 161-195. 被引量:1
  • 10Guedes,J,and Opier, T. , The determinants of the maturity of corporate debt issues[J].Journal of Finance 51 ,1996, 1809-1833. 被引量:1

同被引文献3

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部