摘要
"剩余疑点"是犯罪事实的当前证明状态与法定证明标准之间的"证明距离"。它使刑事审判产生了误判风险。从比较法角度而言,法院的应对方案可分为"接力赛模式"和"辩论赛模式"。两者均可以在一定程度上将剩余疑点的裁判风险控制在一个可接受的范围之内,且以一种相对确定的制度方案将降低误判风险和合理分配误判风险的策略予以法治化。我国剩余疑点风险控制方式可以概括为"职权裁量模式"。其核心问题是剩余疑点误判风险控制的不确定性。结合中国刑诉法的背景,应当从区别对待两种疑点、构建澄清疑点的保障机制和废止撤回起诉等方面合理规制裁判风险。
＂ Residual doubt＂ is the ＂ proof distance＂ of criminal fact between the present proof state and the legal proof standard. It can cause criminal trial emerging wrongful adjudication risks. With regard to the comparative law,the ways used by courts to control the risks can be divided into ＂ Relay Race Model＂ and ＂ Debate Contest Model＂. Both can control the risks of residual doubt to a relatively acceptable level,and use relatively definite systematic plans to make the strategies of decreasing adjudication error risks and distributing adjudication error risks into the path ruled by law. The way of control the risks of residual doubt in China can be generalized as ＂Authority Discretion Model＂. The core issue in such model is the uncertainty of governance of the risks of wrongful verdict. In light of criminal procedural law background in China,we should control adjudication risks from the below methods： dealing with two doubts in different ways,establishing the safeguard mechanisms of doubt clarification and abolishing the practice of withdrawal of a lawsuit.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期153-163,共11页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社会科学基金(12BFX059)"刑事错案风险分配研究"
关键词
剩余疑点
错判风险
接力赛模式
辩论赛模式
职权裁量模式
Residual doubt
Risks of wrongful adjudication
Relay race model
Debate contest model
Authority discretion model
