期刊文献+

静脉输注利多卡因对腹腔镜胆囊切除术快速康复的影响 被引量:29

Effect of intravenous infusion with lidocaine on rapid recovery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨麻醉中静脉输注利多卡因对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后快速康复的影响。方法本研究为前瞻性随机对照研究,选取2016年2至8月温州医科大学附属义乌医院60例拟在全麻下行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(n=30)和利多卡因组(n=30)。利多卡因组患者诱导时注射利多卡因1.5 mg/kg后以2.0 mg·kg-1·h-1速度持续输注至术毕;对照组注射等容量生理盐水。两组患者麻醉诱导均为静注咪唑安定0.03 mg/kg、舒芬太尼0.2 μg/kg、丙泊酚2.0 mg/kg和顺苯磺酸阿曲库铵0.2 mg/kg,丙泊酚0.05~0.20 mg·kg-1·min-1、瑞芬太尼0.1~0.5 μg·kg-1·min-1喉罩维持麻醉使脑电双频指数(BIS)在40~60。记录麻醉诱导前、喉罩置入前、喉罩置入后即刻、手术开始后30 min、苏醒时的BIS值、心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP);观察术后即刻、入麻醉后恢复室(PACU)30 min以及术后2、6、12、24 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS);记录PACU滞留时间、术后下床活动时间、首次肠道排气时间及出院时间;统计两组术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼用量、术后VAS〉3分时追加舒芬太尼(5 μg/次)的频率及术后恶心、呕吐不良反应的发生率,采用简易恢复质量评分量表(QoR-9)评估患者术后满意度。结果利多卡因组在喉罩置入前后的BIS值分别为50.50±3.47、54.63±1.25,低于对照组的54.30±4.78、55.80±2.33,差异有统计学意义(t=3.542、2.423,均P〈0.05)。利多卡因组术后即刻、入PACU后30 min以及术后2、6、12 h的VAS分别为(2.76±0.97)、(2.37±0.93)、(2.10±1.12)、(1.76±0.97)、(1.20±0.76)分,低于对照组的(3.83±1.34)、(3.27±1.26)、(3.06±1.20)、(2.63±0.88)、(1.90±0.84)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.528、3.154、3.217、3.603、3.372,均P〈0.05)。利多卡因组术后即刻、PACU期间追加舒芬� Objective To investigate the effect of intravenous infusion with lidoeaine on rapid recovery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods This study was a prospective randomized controlled triM. From February to August 2016 in Affiliated Yiwu Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 60 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were involved and randomly divided into control group ( n = 30) and lidocaine group ( n = 30). Patients in lidocaine group received lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg intravenously before induction and followed by 2. 0 mg· kg-1 · h-1 to the end of surgery. Patients in control group received equal volumes of saline intravenously. Anesthesia induction in both groups were given intravenous midazolam 0. 03 mg/kg, sufentanil 0. 2 μg/kg, propofol 2. 0 mg/kg and cisatracuium 0. 2 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol 0.05 -0. 20 mg · kg-1· min-1 and remifentanil 0. 1- 0. 5 μg · kg-1· min-1 for laryngeal mask airway which bispectral index (BIS) value maintained at 40 -60. BIS, heart rate(HR) and mean arterial pressure(MAP) were recorded before anesthesia induction, before and immediately after laryngeal mask implantation, intraoperative 30 min and anesthesia awake. Pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (VAS) at postoperation immediately, 30 min during postanesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The time of PACU retention, postoperative ambulation, first intestine venting and discharge were recorded. The dosage of propofol and remifentanil, the frequency of sufentanil used, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using Simple Restoration Quality Score (QoR-9). Results BIS values before and after laryngeal mask implantation in lidocaine group were 50. 50 ± 3.47 and 54. 63 ± 1.25 respectively, which was lower than those in control group (54. 30 ± 4. 78, 55.80 ± 2. 33 ; t = 3. 542, 2. 423, all P 〈 0. 05). The VAS score at
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第12期934-939,共6页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 注射 静脉内 利多卡因 手术后期间 康复 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 Injections, intravenous Lidocaine Postoperative period Rehabilitation Cholecystectomy, laparoscopie
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Bonnin M,Therre P,Albuisson E,et al.Comparison of a propofol target-controlled infusion and inhalational sevoflurane for fibreoptic intubation under spontaneous ventilation[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2007,51(1):54-59. 被引量:1
  • 2Leone M,Rousseau S,Avidan M,et al.Target concentrations of remifentanil with propofol to blunt coughing during intubation,cuff inflation,and tracheal suctioning[J].Br J Anaesth,2004,93(5):660-663. 被引量:1
  • 3Bouvet L,Stoian A,Jacquot-Laperrière S,et al.Laryngeal injuries and intubating conditions with or without muscular relaxation:an equivalence study[J].Can J Anaesth,2008,55(10):674-684. 被引量:1
  • 4Lallo A,Billard V,Bourgain JL.A comparison of propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusions to facilitate fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation[J].Anesth Analg,2009,108(3):852-857. 被引量:1
  • 5Ithnin F,Lim Y,Shah M,et al.Tracheal intubating conditions using propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion:a comparison of remifentanil EC50 for Glidescope and Macintosh[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2009,26(3):223-228. 被引量:1
  • 6Minogue SC,Ralph J,Lampa MJ.Laryngotracheal topicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases the incidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesia[J].Anesth Analg,2004,99(4):1253-1257. 被引量:1
  • 7Hans P,Marechal H,Bonhomme V.Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on coughing in smokers and non-smokers awakening from general anaesthesia at the end of a cervical spine surgery[J].Br J Anaesth,2008,101(5):731-737. 被引量:1
  • 8Williams KA,Barker GL,Harwood RJ,et al.Combined nebulization and spray-as-you-go topical local anaesthesia of the airway[J].Br J Anaesth,2005,95(4):549-553. 被引量:1
  • 9Tsui BC,Cunningham K.Fiberoptic endotracheal intubation after topicalization with in-circuit nebulized lidocaine in a child with a difficult airway[J].Anesth Analg,2004,98(5):1286-1288. 被引量:1
  • 10Techanivate A,Leelanukrom R,Prapongsena P,et al.Effectiveness of mouthpiece nebulization and nasal swab stick packing for topical anesthesia in awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2007,90(10):2063-2071. 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献267

引证文献29

二级引证文献175

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部