期刊文献+

刑事简易程序适用庭前会议的可行性分析

An Feasibility Analysis on Pretrial Conference Applying in Criminal Summary Procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2012年3月修改实施的《刑事诉讼法》,在我国正式确立了刑事案件适用庭前会议制度。在庭前会议实施过程中,理论界和实务届对于刑事简易程序是否适用庭前会议争议很大,具体的司法实践中甚至出现了截然相反的做法。根据立法本意和刑事简易程序的适用范围来看,刑事简易程序完全可以适用庭前会议。建议由全国人大常委会就庭前会议适用的相关问题出台权威的立法解释,或由最高人民法院、最高人民检察院就庭前会议适用的相关问题联合颁布司法解释予以规范。 The new Criminal Procedure Law of PRC amended in March,2012, has formally adopted the pretrial conference applying in criminal litigation. Since the introduction of the criminal pretrial conference, there has been hot dispute in theory and practice. Can the pretrial conference be applied in criminal summary procedure In juridical practice, some judicial in favor of the applying, but some other oppose it on the contrary. Based on the legislative intent of the Criminal Procedure Law and the application scope of criminal summary procedure, the pretrial conference can be applied in the criminal summary procedure without doubt. It is recommended that the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress should release the formal legislative interpretation for the applying of the criminal pretrial conference in criminal case , or the Supreme People's Court and the People's Supreme People's Procuratorate should release the judicial interpretation jointly for the pretrial conference in criminal case.
作者 孟祥金 MENG Xiangjin(The People's Procuratorate of Licheng District,Jinan Shandon)
出处 《山东农业工程学院学报》 2017年第3期119-122,共4页 The Journal of Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University
关键词 刑事案件 庭前会议 简易程序 criminal litigation pretrial conference criminal summary procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1邱联恭.程序选择权之法理——着重阐述其理论基础并准以展望新世纪之民事程序法学[A]台北:三民书局,1993575. 被引量:1
  • 2麦高伟;杰弗里·威尔逊;姚永吉.英国刑事司法程序[M]北京:法律出版社,2003294-296. 被引量:1
  • 3龙宗智.刑事庭审制度研究[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001161-162. 被引量:1
  • 4无锡市滨湖区人民法院、人民检察院和司法局共同签署了《刑事案件庭前会议实施纪要》. 被引量:1
  • 5盐城市亭湖区人民法院、人民检察院和司法局共同通过了《刑事公诉案件庭前会议实施意见(试行)》. 被引量:1
  • 6《美国刑事诉讼规则》(Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)第17.1条. 被引量:1
  • 7英国《2013年刑事诉讼规则》(The Criminal Procedure Rules 2013)第15 .1条. 被引量:1
  • 8“中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定”,载《中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第四次全体会议文件汇编》,人民出版社2014年版,第45页. 被引量:1
  • 9“Precisely because confessions of guilt,whether coerced or freely given,may be truthful and potent evidence,we did not believe a jury could be called upon to ignore the probative value of a truthful but coerced confession;it was also likely,we thought,that in judging voluntariness itself the jury would be influenced by the reliability of a confession it considered an accurate account of the facts.”From Lego v.Twomey,404 U.S.477,92 S.Ct.619,30 L.Ed.2d618 (1972). 被引量:1
  • 10Wayne R.La Fave,Jerold H.Israel,Nancy J.King,Orin S.Kerr,Criminal Procedure,Fifth Edition,Minnesota:West,pp.568. 被引量:1

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部