摘要
在清代学术理路和西潮冲击之下,墨子及墨学在清末民初引起知识分子的广泛关注。作为现代学术史上的典范性人物,胡适和梁启超对于墨学的偏爱和阐释可以说具有典范意义,其学术主张存在共同性,同时也存在着差异性。二人都比较重视墨子的《墨辩》部分,以此来发明中国传统学术的"科学精神",但二人对于墨学的理解和阐释也存在根本性差异:一主"智",一重"爱"。以话语分析的视角看,现代性的科学话语和反省现代性的玄学话语构成了胡适和梁启超墨学知识生产的核心要素。可以说,"五四"之后中国思想界对于文化现代化的思索呈现出多岐性,正是对于文化现代性的不同方案导致了胡适和梁启超以及不同学术群体对于传统阐释产生差异。因此,胡适和梁启超关于墨学研究的异同离合可视为近代中国一典型的学术史事件。
Under academic thought in the Qing Dynasty and the impact of the influx of the west, Mo-tse and Mohism caused widespread concern of the intellectuals in the late Qing dynasty. As typicai characters in the modern academic history, the research on Mohism of Hu Shih and Liang Chi-chao is significant. As for the academic thought, there are something com- mon, but there are also differences. On the one hand they paled more attention to ＂Mohist Debate＂ in order to invent the scien- tific spirit of the Chinese traditional academic; but on the other, Hu Shih emphasized knowledge and Liang Chi-chaoemphasized humanity. From the perspective of critical discourse analysis, scientific discourse and metaphysical discourse consisted of core elements of knowledge production. It can be said that the Chinese thinkers for cultural modernization research presented a com- plex situation. It is the different programs of cultural modernity that led to different interpretations of tradition between Hu Shih and Liang Chi-chao, as well as different academic groups .Similarities and differences between Hu Shih and Liang Chi-chao on the study of Mohism constituted typical ＂an academic history event＂in Modern China.
作者
宁腾飞
NING Teng-fei(Nan Kai University, Department of History, Tianjin 300350, Chin)
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期55-61,共7页
Qilu Journal
关键词
胡适
梁启超
科学精神
科玄之争
Hu Shih
Liang Chi-chao
scientific spirit
struggle between metaphysics and science
