期刊文献+

PD-1/PD-L1抗体与多西他赛治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌安全性Meta分析 被引量:11

Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody versus docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer:A Meta analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)是肺癌最常见的病理类型,目前免疫疗法是其研究热点。本研究对程序细胞死亡蛋白-1(programmed cell death protein 1,PD-1)及其配体(programmed cell death ligand 1,PD-L1)抗体与多西他赛在晚期NSCLC二线以上治疗中的安全性进行比较。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、CBM、CNKI、VIP和WanFang Data数据库截止到2016-05,公开发表的PD-1/PD-L1抗体与多西他赛在晚期非小细胞肺癌治疗中的Ⅱ/Ⅲ期病例对照临床试验文献,通过文献筛选,提取数据,采用RevMan 5.3软件对纳入文献进行Meta分析。应用STATA 12.0对发表偏倚进行分析。结果 PD-1/PD-L1抗体组与多西他赛组相比,1-4级的总不良反应、粒细胞减少、贫血、恶心、疲乏反应较低,其中总不良反应的合并相对危险度(risk ratio,RR)和95%置信区间(confidence interval,95%CI)为0.78(0.74-0.81),粒细胞减少为0.02(0.01-0.05),贫血为0.21(0.12-0.35),恶心为0.54(0.44-0.65),疲乏为0.56(0.47-0.65)。但免疫相关不良反应如皮疹、肺炎、甲状腺功能亢进和甲状腺功能减退的风险较高,皮疹RR(95%CI)为2.01(1.14-3.51),肺炎为3.19(1.9-5.34),甲状腺功能亢进为5.1(2.23-11.68),甲状腺功能减退为23.36(8.04-67.90)。结论在晚期非小细胞肺二线以上治疗中,PD-1/PD-L抗体组的不良反应包括粒细胞减少等发生风险明显低于多西他赛组;而免疫相关不良反应发生风险高。 OBJECTIVE Non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)is the most common pathological type of lung cancer,and now immune therapy is the current focus.This systematic review was conducted to compare the safety of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody with chemotherapy docetaxel alone in advanced NSCLC.METHODS Scientific databases were searched for relevant controlled clinical trials comparing the safety of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody with docetaxel.PhaseⅡ/Ⅲrandomized controlled trials were selected in which patients suffering advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive PD-1/PD-L1 antibody versus docetaxel alone.Meta analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3and STATA 12.RESULTS After exclusion of non-eligible citations,a total of 4clinical randomized controlled trials were eligible for the meta analysis.The risk ratio(RR)and 95% Confidence interval(95%CI)of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody over docetaxel were 0.78(0.74-0.81)for all-grade adverse events,0.02(0.01-0.05)for all-grade neutropenia,0.21(0.12-0.35)for all-grade anemia,0.54(0.44-0.65)for all-grade nausea,and 0.56(0.47-0.65)for all-grade fatigue,respectively.However,the RR and95%CI of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody were 2.01(1.14-3.51)for rash,3.19(1.9-5.34)for pneumonitis,5.1(2.23-11.68)for hyperthyroidism,and 23.36(8.04-67.90)for hypothyroidism compared with that of docetaxel.CONCLUSIONS The incidence of adverse events of grad 1-4and 3-4like neutropenia were significantly lower in advanced NSCLC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 antibody than those taking docetaxel while the incidence of immune related adverse events were obviously higher thanthat of docetaxel.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第21期1450-1454,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 国家自然基金面上项目(81272615) 首都医科大学临床与基础合作课题(15JL33) 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院院启动基金(yyqdkt2014-12)
关键词 PD-1抗体 PD-L1抗体 多西他赛 非小细胞肺癌 NSCLC META分析 PD-1antibody PD-L1antibody docetaxel non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献40

  • 1Stineheombe TE,Soeinki MA. Treatment paradigms for advanced stage non small cell lung cancer in the era of multiple lines of therapy[J]. J Thoracic Oncol, 2009,4 (2) : 243-250. 被引量:1
  • 2Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. Erlotinib as mainte- nance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: amulti- centre,randomised, placebo controlled phase 3 study[J]. Lanct OncoL,2010,11 (6) :521 -529. 被引量:1
  • 3Perol M, Chouaid C, Milleron BJ, et al. Maintenance with either gem- citabine or erlotinib versus observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in ad- vanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase III study[J]. J Clin Oncol (meeting abstracts), 2010,28(20) : 7507-7512. 被引量:1
  • 4Parmar MK,Torri V, Stewart L, et al. Extracting summary sta- tistics to perform meta-analysis of the published literature for survival endpoints[J]. Stat Med, 1998,17 (24) : 2815-2834. 被引量:1
  • 5Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the. difference be tween two estimates[J]. BMJ,2003,326(7382) :219-224. 被引量:1
  • 6Mok TS, Wu YL, Yu CJ, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of sequential erlotinib and chemotherapy as first- line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(30) :5080 5087. 被引量:1
  • 7Kabbinavar FF, Miller VA, Johnson BE, et al. Overall survival (OS) in ATLAS, a phase m b trial comparing bevacizumab (B) therapy with or without erlotinib (E) after completion of chemotherapy (chemo) with B for first-line treatment of locally advanced, recur- rent,or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NS(2LC)[J]. J Clin Oncol (meeting abstracts) ,2010,28(4) :7526 -7530. 被引量:1
  • 8Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, et al. TRIBUTE Investigator Group:TRIBUTE:a phase lli trial of erlotinib hydrochloride(OSI- 774) combined with earboplatin and paelitaxel chemo~therapy in ad- vanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. J Clin Oneol, 2005,23 (25) : 5892-5899. 被引量:1
  • 9Egger M,Davey SG,Schneider M,et al. Bias in meta analysis de- tected by a simple, graphical test[J]. BMJ, 1997,315(7109) : 629- 634. 被引量:1
  • 10Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks J J, et al. Measuringineonsistency in Meta-analyses[J]. BMJ, 2003,327 (7414) : 557-560. 被引量:1

共引文献19

同被引文献70

引证文献11

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部