摘要
共同危险侵权中,无法确定损害后果是哪个具体行为人的行为造成的,学界对这种特殊因果关系的性质存在择一因果、相当因果、推定因果、结合因果学说等争论。推定因果关系既保护了受害人利益,也维护了具体行为人的自由,该种因果关系是对共同危险侵权因果关系的准确定性。采纳推定因果关系说并免除能够证明自己行为与损害后果没有因果关系的行为人的责任承担是世界立法通例,也符合法理。
Joint dangerous act, which is unable to determine the injury consequence caused by the concrete behavior of the person, the academic circles to the special nature of the causal relationship between alternative causal, quite a causal, presumption of causality, combined with the causal theory argument. Presumption of causality is protect the interests of the victim, or maintenance of the concrete behavior person＇s freedom, this kind of infringement of causality is the common risk accurate qualitative causal relationship. Adopted presumed causality is exempt from can prove no causal relationship between act＇s behavior and injury consequence liability is one of the world legislation, also conforms to the legal theory.
作者
郭辉
GUO Hui(Law School,Central Justice and Police College, Baoding 071000 China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期102-111,共10页
Hebei Law Science
基金
李书金教授主持的2015年度河北省社科基金项目<司法腐败预防机制研究>(HB15GL001)课题的阶段成果
关键词
共同侵权
共同危险侵权
因果关系
推定因果关系
免责事由
joint tort
joint dangerous act
causal relationship
presumption of causality
general defenses
