摘要
基于其"共享自然资源"的法律属性,跨界水资源的水权性质应界定为跨界水资源的主权所有权,其不是跨界水资源主权,更不是基于国内物权理论构建的跨界水资源所有权,应当属于流域各国对跨界水资源的一种公权性支配。限制主权理论因忽视跨界水资源的主权所有权,在实践和理论中都面临着困境而应被摒弃。随着生态系统管理理念的法律化,在明确跨界水资源的主权所有权的前提下,共同利益理论作为解决跨界水资源冲突与合作的根本解决途径,应从跨界水资源保护相关的实体性规则和程序性规则两个维度予以构建,与之相关的要素主要包括主体、制度、程序等方面,这也是未来跨界水资源理论发展的新课题。
Based on the legal nature of 'sharing' natural resources for transboundary water resources,the nature of water rights of transboundary water resources should be defined as sovereign ownership of transboundary water resources,not sovereignty of transboundary water resources,nor transboundary water resources ownership built on the basis of domestic property ownership theory.It belongs to the public disposal right of countries along the river.Limited sovereignty theory neglects the sovereign ownership of transboundary water resources,thus it faces a dilemma in theory and practice and should be abandoned.With the legalization of the concept of ecosystem management,under the premise of clarification of the sovereign ownership of transboundary water resources,common interests theory should be regarded as the solution for conflicts and cooperation of transboundary water resources.It should be constructed from the dimensions of substantive rules and procedural rules concerning transboundary water conservation.The related factors in relation to the construction include entity,system and procedure etc.This is also the new task for future transboundary water resources theory development.
出处
《国际论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期36-41,共6页
International Forum
