摘要
刑法学理论界及实务界对形式解释论与实质解释论所持立场不一,而刑法解释作为对刑法规范含义的阐明以及对刑法概念术语定义之说明,坚持形式解释论或实质解释论立场,事关刑法理论界刑法观立场的秉持及司法实务界裁判结果的公正与否。从罪刑法定原则、刑罚处罚范围及社会风险控制层面进行考量,相对形式解释论,实质解释论具有相对合理性,能更好地规制与预防犯罪。
There have different stances about theory of formal and substantial interpretation in theory and practice. However, as to clarify the meaning of criminal law norms as well as a description of the definition of related concepts of criminal law term, explanation of criminal law is involved in specific provision in the micro level of meaning. Adoption theory of formal or substantial interpretation is the most striking difference between formal and substantial theory. Therefore, research for theory of formal and substantial interpretation is crucial to the stance of formal and substantial theory of criminal law and specific fairness in judicial practice. In order to regulate and prevent crime, it analyzes and explains the relative rationality of theory of substantial interpretation from the level of a legally prescribed punishment, penal punishment scope, and social risk.
作者
刘杰
LIU Jie(College of Laws, Guizhou University, Guizhou 550025, Chin)
出处
《宜春学院学报》
2017年第2期23-27,共5页
Journal of Yichun University
关键词
刑法解释
形式解释论
实质解释论
criminal interpretation
theory of formal interpretation
theory of substantial interpretation
