期刊文献+

情侣沟通模式及匹配对抑郁的影响 被引量:1

The influence of college dating couples' communication patterns and matching on depression
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨沟通模式及匹配对情侣抑郁症状的影响。方法通过方便抽样原则选取全国9所高校在校大学生情侣300对,并使用沟通方式问卷及流调中心抑郁量表对其进行测查。数据采用二次响应面方程进行分析。结果(1)要求/回避沟通男女分值为(3.93±1.10)分,(4.10±1.09)分,建设沟通男女分值为(6.65±1.70)分,(6.49±1.74)分,完全回避沟通男女分值为(3.85±1.70)分,(4.02±1.98)分,男女生抑郁分值为(1.60±0.42)分,(1.61±0.42)分;男生抑郁与自身的要求/回避沟通呈正相关(r=0.222,P〈0.01),男生抑郁与女生的要求/回避沟通呈正相关(r=0.118,P〈0.05)。女生抑郁与积极建设性沟通呈负相关(r=-0.407,P〈0.01),与男生积极建设性沟通呈负相关(r=-0.306,P〈0.01)。(2)男女要求/回避沟通(t=5.489,b=0.267,P〈0.01;t=2.538,b=0.138,P〈0.05)都正向预测自身抑郁水平;男女建设性沟通负向预测自身抑郁水平(t=-5.158,b=0.382,P〈0.01;t=-4.539,b=0.299,P〈0.01);男生完全回避沟通分数可正向预测自身抑郁水平(t=1.918,b=0.174,P〈0.05)。(3)男生建设性沟通可负向预测女生的抑郁(t=-3.306,b=0.189,P〈0.01)。(4)男女的抑郁水平还受到双方沟通模式一致性影响。结论建设性沟通有助于情侣的心理健康并减少抑郁的发生。要求回避沟通和完全回避沟通会增加抑郁发生风险。 Objective To explore the influence of lovers' communication patterns and matching on their depression symptoms. Methods 300 pairs of dating couple were recruited from nine universities in Hebei, Henan, Beijing and Shanghai by convenience sampling principle. They were asked to fulfill the communication patterns questionnaire-short form and center for epidemiologic studies depression scale.Polynomial regression model with response surface method was adopted to analyze the results. Results ( 1 ) The scores of demands/withdraw, completely avoid, constructive communication of boys and girls were ( 3.93±1.10,4.10 ±1.09) (6.65±1.70,6.49±1.74)( 3.85± 1.70,4.02±1.98), and the scores of depression of boys and girls were (1.60±0.42,1.61±0.42).Boys depression was significantly positive correlated with its own demands/ withdraw communication( r=0.222, P〈0.01 ), and significantly positive correlated with girls demands/withdraw communication ( r=0. 118, P〈 0.05).Girls depression was significantly negative correlated with constructive communication of their own( r=-0.407, P〈0.01 ), and significantly negative correlated with the boys constructive communication ( r=-0.306, P〈0.01 ). (2)Demand/withdraw communication could predict their own depression positively both for males and females( t= 5.489, b = 0.267, P〈0.01, t= 2.538, b = 0.138, /9〈0.05) .Constructive communication could predict depression negatively both for males and females ( t =-5.158, b = 0.382, P〈0.01 ; t= -4.539, b = 0.299, P〈0.001 ).Males' avoidance communication pattern could predict their own depression positively( t= 1.918, b = 0.174, P〈0.05 ). ( 3 ) Males' constructive communication scores could predict females' depression negatively( t=-3.306, b = 0.189, P〈0.01 ). (4)The consistency of communication pattern could influence couples' depression. Conclusion Constructive communication contributes to lovers' mental health and reduce the probability of their depre
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期153-157,共5页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 科技基础性工作专项(2009FY110100) 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室课题项目(KLMH2015G04)
关键词 沟通方式 抑郁 成对样本 二次响应面 情侣 Communication patterns Depression Paired samples Quadratic polynomial regression with response surface Dating couple
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献84

  • 1Alferes, V. R., & Kenny, D. A. (2009). SPSS programs for the measurement of nonindependence in standard dyadic designs. Behavioral Research Methods, 41, 47-54. 被引量:1
  • 2Brauer, M., & Judd, C. M. (2000). Defining variables in relationship to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effect. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 36, 410--423. 被引量:1
  • 3Bulter, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific. Emotion, 7, 30-48. 被引量:1
  • 4Burkholder, G. J., & Harlow, L. L. (2003). An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10,465-486. 被引量:1
  • 5Cillessen, A. H. N., Jiang, X. L., West, T. V., & Laszkowski, D. K. (2005). Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 165-172. 被引量:1
  • 6Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user friendly guide. Personal Relationship, 9, 327-342. 被引量:1
  • 7Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510-531. 被引量:1
  • 8Cook, W. L. (1998). Integrating models of interdependence with treatment evaluations in marital therapy research. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 529-542. 被引量:1
  • 9Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109. 被引量:1
  • 10Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555-575. 被引量:1

共引文献61

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部