期刊文献+

食管癌切除术术前风险评分(PRSEC)与预后的关系 被引量:2

Relationship between preoperative risk score for esophageal cancer(PRSEC) and prognosis after resection of esophageal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨食管癌术术前风险评分(PRSEC)与食管癌切除术后患者预后的关系。方法回顾性分析2005~2015年我院行食管癌切除术的498例食管癌患者的临床资料,其中男392例、女106例,中位年龄59(30~83)岁。通过术前风险评分(修订的心脏风险指数、终末期肝病模型评分和肺功能测试评分)将患者分为3组:PRSEC1组,PRSEC2组和PRSEC3组,计算总体生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),分析术前风险评分与患者预后的关系。结果患者的死亡率、发病率、DFS及OS都与食管癌切除术前评分有关。对于行食管癌切除术的患者,食管癌切除术术前评分可以清楚地预测其短期的治疗效果。评分为2分和3分的患者死亡率和发病率的风险显著高于1分的患者。另外,评分高的患者DFS和OS更短(P<0.001)。结论食管癌切除术前风险评分评分方式简便易行,能客观地反映患者发病率、死亡率、长期治疗效果。 Objective To introduce a simple preoperative risk score for esophageal cancer (PRSEC) and its relationship with the prognosis of patients who underwent resection of esophageal carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 498 patients receiving resection of esophageal carcinoma between 2005 and 2015 in our hospital. They were divided into three groups (PRSEC1, PRSEC2 and PRSEC3 groups) according to the results of PRSEC (revised cardiac risk index, model for end-stage liver disease score and pulmonary function test). Their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were measured to find the relationship between the PRSEC and prognosis of patients. Results The mortality, morbidity, DFS and OS were correlative with the PRSEC. Therefore the PRSEC can be used to predict the short-term outcome. The patients with score 2 or 3 had higher risk of mortality and morbidity than those with score 1. In addition, the DFS and OS of patients with higher score were shorter (P〈0.001). Conclusion The PRSEC is easy and efficient and can predict the morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcomes for the patients with resection of esophageal carcinoma.
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 2017年第3期188-191,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
基金 甘肃省自然科学基金项目资助(145RJZA137)
关键词 食管癌 食管癌术前风险评分 食管癌切除术 回顾性研究 Esophageal cancer preoperative risk score for esophageal cancer esophageal resection retrospective study
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献58

  • 1方文涛,陈文虎,范利民,曹克俭,陈勇,蒋勇.食管癌切除术后不同重建途径吻合口瘘的原因及预防[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(3):217-219. 被引量:56
  • 2潘开云,张文山,郭银枞.中上段食管癌两种三切口术式的临床研究[J].肿瘤学杂志,2005,11(3):210-212. 被引量:10
  • 3Bellentani S, Saccoccio G, Costa G, Tiribelli C, Manenti F, SoddeM, Saveria Crocè L, Sasso F, Pozzato G, Cristianini G, BrandiG. Drinking habits as cofactors of risk for alcohol induced liverdamage. The Dionysos Study Group. Gut 1997; 41: 845-850 [PMID:9462221]. 被引量:1
  • 4Becker U, Deis A, S-rensen TI, Gr-nbaek M, Borch-Johnsen K,Müller CF, Schnohr P, Jensen G. Prediction of risk of liver diseaseby alcohol intake, sex, and age: a prospective population study.Hepatology 1996; 23: 1025-1029 [PMID: 8621128 DOI: 10.1002/hep.510230513]. 被引量:1
  • 5Altamirano J, Higuera-de laTijera F, Duarte-Rojo A, Martínez-Vázquez MA, Abraldes JG, Herrera-Jiménez LE, Michelena J,Zapata L, Perez-Hernández J, Torre A, Gonzáles-González JA,Cardenas A, Dominguez M, Arroyo V, Ginès P, Caballería J,Bataller R. The amount of alcohol consumption negatively impactsshort-term mortality in Mexican patients with alcoholic hepatitis.Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1472-1480 [PMID: 21556041 DOI:10.1038/ajg.2011.141]. 被引量:1
  • 6Choi G, Runyon BA. Alcoholic hepatitis: a clinician's guide. ClinLiver Dis 2012; 16: 371-385 [PMID: 22541704 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2012.03.015]. 被引量:1
  • 7Singal AK, Shah VH. Alcoholic hepatitis: prognostic models andtreatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2011; 40: 611-639 [PMID:21893277 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2011.06.008]. 被引量:1
  • 8Lucey MR, Mathurin P, Morgan TR. Alcoholic hepatitis. N EnglJ Med 2009; 360: 2758-2769 [PMID: 19553649 DOI: 10.1056/nejmra0805786]. 被引量:1
  • 9Maddrey WC, Boitnott JK, Bedine MS, Weber FL, Mezey E, WhiteRI. Corticosteroid therapy of alcoholic hepatitis. Gastroenterology1978; 75: 193-199 [PMID: 352788]. 被引量:1
  • 10Forrest EH, Evans CD, Stewart S, Phillips M, Oo YH, McAvoyNC, Fisher NC, Singhal S, Brind A, Haydon G, O'Grady J, Day CP,Hayes PC, Murray LS, Morris AJ. Analysis of factors predictive ofmortality in alcoholic hepatitis and derivation and validation of theGlasgow alcoholic hepatitis score. Gut 2005; 54: 1174-1179 [PMID:16009691]. 被引量:1

共引文献202

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部