期刊文献+

选择性脾蒂阻断在腹腔镜脾脏部分切除术中的应用 被引量:17

Selective splenic pedicle occlusion in laparoscoic partial splenectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨选择性脾蒂阻断技术在腹腔镜脾脏部分切除术中的手术技巧及临床应用。方法回顾性分析2011年5月至2016年11月四川大学华西医院40例行腹腔镜脾脏部分切除术患者的临床资料,其中14例患者应用选择性脾蒂阻断技术,26例术中未使用脾蒂阻断技术,分析2组的手术技巧及其安全性。结果选择性脾蒂阻断组患者术中出血量更少:(82±36)ml比(178±81)ml(t=-4.221,P=0.001),而在手术时间:(111±17)min比(127±40)min(t=-1.438,P=0.190),手术中转率:(0/14,0/26)(Fisher=0.000,P=1.000),输血率:(0/14,0/26)(Fisher=0.000,P=1.000),术后并发症发生率:(1/14,2/26)(Fisher=0.063,P=0.800)及术后住院时间:(7.1±2.3)d比(6.0±1.3)d(t=1.280,P=0.220)等,2组比较差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜脾脏部分切除术中选择性脾蒂阻断技术安全可行.同时可以减少术中出血量。 Objective To assess the surgical skills and clinical outcomes of selective splenic pedicle occlusion ( SSPO ) in laparoscoic partial splenectomy. Methods Between May 2011 and Nov 2016, 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial splenectomy were devided into selective splenic pedicle occlusion group (14 cases) and conventional laparoscopic partial splenectomy group (26 cases). Results There were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups. Significantly less intraoperative blood loss ( 82 ±36) ml vs ( 178 ±81 ) ml ( t = - 4. 2, P = 0. 001 ) were observed in group of SSPD, There were no significant differences between the groups in operative time (111 ± 17)min vs (127 ±40)min( t = -1.4, P=0.19), transfusion rate (0/14,0/26) (P=1), conversion rate (0/14,0/26) ( P = 1 ), postoperative complications ( 1/14,2/26 ) ( Fisher = 0. 063, P = 0.80) and length of postoperative hospital stay(7.1 ±2.3) d vs (6.0±1.3) d (t =1.28, P=0.22). Conclusions SSPO is feasible and safe for patients receiving laparoscopic partial splenectomy.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期122-125,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 脾切除术 脾蒂阻断 Laparoscopes Spleneetomy Splenic pedicle occlusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

共引文献41

同被引文献121

引证文献17

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部