摘要
审判中心主义改革是我国近期出现的一场重大司法改革运动。但为推动这一改革所出台的实施意见,却只是对现行制度做出了再次强调和重申,而少有真正实质性的改革措施。这次改革没有触动侦查中心主义的诉讼构造,没有贯彻真正的直接和言词原则,没有真正树立法院定罪证明标准的最高权威,没有确保嫌疑人、被告人获得有效的辩护。近期新出现的国家监察体制的改革还有可能使审判中心主义陷入新的困境。对于审判中心主义改革,我们确有进行全面反思的必要。
The promotion of trial-centeredness is an important judicial reform in China, but suggestions of relevant departments regarding this reform just reaffirms and restates the importance of the reform without offering any substantial measures. This reform fails to change the investigation-centered lawsuit mechanism, or implement the direct and oral evidence principle, or establish the highest authority of the standards by which the court decides criminality, or establish the types of effective defense that the suspect and the defendant are titled to. The recent supervision system reform may virtually create some challenge to trial-centeredness. Therefore, it is of necessity to reflect on trial-centeredness in the judicial reform.
出处
《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期33-43,共11页
Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金
国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心资助的研究成果
关键词
审判中心主义
直接和言词原则
证明标准
有效辩护
监察体制改革
trial-centeredness
direct and oral evidence principle
justification principle
valid defense
the supervision system reform
