摘要
目的研究急诊不同确诊治疗时机对急性肺栓塞的临床疗效及预后的影响。方法选取急性肺栓塞患者86例,依据确诊治疗时机分为实验组(<2周)和对照组(>2周),比较两组患者的临床疗效及预后。结果实验组治疗总有效率(95.7%)高于对照组(80.0%),经过1年随访,实验组不良事件发生率(6.5%)低于对照组(25.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性肺栓塞在急诊2周内确诊并治疗,能够提高治疗效果,降低不良事件的发生,改善预后。
Objective To study the clinical effect and prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated by different diagnosis and treatment opportunity in emergency department. Methods 86 cases of patients with acute pulmonary embolism were divided into experimental group（ 〈2 weeks） and control group（ 〉2 weeks） according to the time of diagnosis,the clinical effect and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results The experimental group total effective rate（95.7%） higher than that of the control group（80.0%）, after 1 years of follow-up, the incidence of adverse events in the experimental group（6.5%） was lower than that of the control group（25.0%）, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Acute pulmonary embolism was diagnosed and treated within 2 weeks of emergency treatment, which can improve the therapeutic effect, reduce the incidence of adverse events, and improve the prognosis.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第2期70-71,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
急诊
不同确诊治疗时机
急性肺栓塞
预后
emergency treatment
different diagnosis and treatment opportunity in emergency department
acute pulmonary embolism
prognosis
