摘要
交通肇事罪的司法认定极易出现不合理的情形,特别是在处理较为复杂的交通事故时,更易混淆罪与非罪的界限。原因在于司法实践没有明确本罪实行行为的地位,没有准确把握本罪实行行为的本质。因此,认定交通肇事罪的实行行为时,必须确立过失实行行为的独立地位,把握其违反结果回避义务的本质。只有违反交通运输管理法规,并且具备违反结果回避义务之实质内容的行为,才成立交通肇事罪的实行行为。
The judicial cognizance of traffic accident crime is easy to be proved unreasonable,especially when dealing with complicated traffic accident,the boundaries of crime and non- crime is more confusing. The reason is that in judicial practice the status of this crime＇s perpetrating act is not defined and the essence of this crime＇s perpetrating act is not accurately grasped. Therefore,to do the judicial cognizance of this crime＇s perpetrating act,we must establish the independent status of negligent perpetrating act and grasp the essence of its breach results.Only when violating traffic transportation management regulations and having violated the duty to avoid damaging results,the traffic accident crime＇s perpetrating act would be constituted.
作者
霍俊阁
HUO Jun - ge(Law School of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
出处
《河南警察学院学报》
2016年第6期86-91,共6页
Journal of Henan Police College
关键词
交通肇事罪
实行行为
结果回避义务
成立标准
traffic accident crime
perpetrating act
the duty to avoid damaging results
the standard of constitution
