摘要
为提高诉讼效率,台湾地区于2004年4月增订认罪协商程序,在非重罪案件中刑事被告以认罪为前提和检察官进行量刑交易,从而正式建立台湾式的"辩诉交易"制度。台湾地区认罪协商程序在谋求程序简约的同时,力图坚守公平正义的底线,建构了较完善的程序保障机制。从十余年的实施效果考察,认罪协商程序虽然适用率不是很高,但是在节省诉讼资源、处理边界存有灰色地带的案件时,仍有其他程序无法取代的优势。认罪协商已成为台湾地区刑事诉讼制度不可或缺的一环。
In order to improve the efficiency of proceedings, the Taiwan legislators introduced the plea-bargaining into the criminal procedure in April 2004, allowing criminal defendants who plead guilty to negotiate with the prosecutors on sentencing in certain non-felony cases, which formally established the Taiwan-style ＂plea bargaining＂ system. While in the pursuit of sim- ple procedure, the plea agreement procedure has tried to stick to fairness and justice as its bottom line and constructed a securi- ty mechanism of perfect program. Based on the ten years＇ examination of its effect, it is found that the procedure has its irre- placeable advantages in saving the judicial resources and handling the boundary cases of grey area despite its low applicable rate. Undoubtedly, the plea bargaining has become an integral part of the criminal litigant system in Taiwan.
出处
《台湾研究集刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期19-26,共8页
Taiwan Research Journal
基金
2015年福建省社科规划项目"福建预防腐败机制创新与地方法制研究"(FJ2015TWB040)
关键词
台湾地区
认罪协商
诉讼效率
Taiwan, plea-bargaining, litigation efficiency
