期刊文献+

语义何以足够最小:非语境敏感语义学的新进展 被引量:5

Is Semantic Minimalism Minimal Enough:New Development of Insensitive Semantics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对语义研究主流的语境主义倾向,H·卡培朗和E·勒珀尔提出了非语境敏感语义学,也称为"语义最小论",认为一个句子一经说出就具有一个不受语境影响的最小语义内容。E·博格和G·普雷尔则在坚持句子语义最小论的基本立场上进一步提出了"语义如何足够最小"的问题,在严格区分意图行为与语义内容、坚持命题主义立场、索引词类型的概念模型建立等方面做了新的理论尝试,力图说明句子的语义内容完全由其句法结构和词项内容所触发,与意图、情境等因素无关。这一理论新进展,值得讨论。 Against the predominant tendency of contextualism in meaning studies, H. Cappelen and E.Lepore have proposed the insensitive semantics, or semantic minimalism, claiming that an uttered sentence has a minimal semantic content that is independent of contextual factors. Later, E. Borg and G. Preyer have raised the question of how minimalism can be minimal enough and pushed the minimalist effort still further,attempting to prove that sentence meaning is determined by its syntactic structure and its component words'meanings, while intention and situation etc have no contribution in this respect. To establish this point, they have newly advocated a rigorous distinction of intentional behavior and semantic content, adhered more strictly to propositionalism and proposed to set up a conceptual model for indexical term type.
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期47-54,共8页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"开明的自然主义研究"(16BZX020)
关键词 语义最小论 非语境敏感性 语义内容 言语行为 semantic minimalism insensitive semantics semantic content speech act
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献79

  • 1沈家煊.语用学和语义学的分界[J].外语教学与研究,1990,22(2):26-35. 被引量:45
  • 2曹剑波,张立英.知识论语境主义对怀疑主义难题的解答[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,57(3):19-26. 被引量:2
  • 3Williams, M., Unnatural Doubts : Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1996. pp. 108-119. 被引量:1
  • 4Unger, P.,Ignorance : A Case for Skepticism, New York : Oxford University Press, 1975. p. 95. 被引量:1
  • 5Sehiffer, S., "Contextualist Solutions to Skepticism", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96, 1996. pp. 317-333. 被引量:1
  • 6DeRose, K., "Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions", Philosophy and Pheuomenological Research, 52 (4), 1992. p. 917. 被引量:1
  • 7Lewis, D., "Seorekeeping in a Language Game", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 1979. pp. 339-359. 被引量:1
  • 8DeRose, K., "Solving the Skeptical Problem", The Philosophical Review, 104 ( 1 ), 1995. p. 9. 被引量:1
  • 9Lewis, D., "Elusive Knowledge". Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74 (4) , 1996. pp. 549-567. 被引量:1
  • 10Schiffer, S., "Contextualist Solutions to Skepticism", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96, 1996. pp. 318-319. 被引量:1

共引文献32

同被引文献15

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部