期刊文献+

经胆囊管胆道造影与外引流在腹腔镜胆总管切开一期缝合术中的应用 被引量:15

Primary closure after laparoscopic choledochotomy with transcystic cholangiography and biliary drainage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析比较胆总管切开一期缝合与胆总管切开一期缝合经胆囊管置细导管胆道造影和胆道外引流的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2013年6月至2016年3月我院46例腹腔镜胆总管切开一期缝合(A组)与51例腹腔镜胆总管切开一期缝合经胆囊管胆道造影和胆道外引流(B组)患者的临床资料。结果腹腔镜胆总管切开探查一期缝合(A组)术后胆漏发生率较高,两组差异有统计学意义(8.7%比0,P〈0.05)。胆总管切开一期缝合经胆囊管胆道造影和胆道外引流组患者所需手术时间略长[(125.3±28.3)min比(131.3±20.5)min],差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组患者术后住院时间差异无统计学意义[(7.3±2.4)d比(7.8±1.9)d,P〉0.05]。患者随访3-29个月,平均8.4个月,B超检查无胆管残余结石,肝功能正常。结论胆道镜的应用使胆总管一期缝合成为可能,经胆囊管胆道造影和胆道外引流使胆总管一期缝合更安全、可靠。 Objective To assess the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic primary closure of common bile duct (CBD)with or without transcystic cholangiography and transeystic biliary drainage. Methods From June 2013 to March 2016, we operated on 46 patients who underwent primary closure of common bile duct after laparoscopie choledoehotomy ( group A). The results were compared with 51 patients who underwent primary closure of common bile duct after laparoseopie choledochotomy together with transeystic biliary drainage (group B) during the same study period. Results There was a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bile leakage between the two groups. The risk in group A was sig- nificantly higher than group B ( 8.7 % vs 0% , P 〈 0.05 ). The duration of operation in group A was significantly shorter than in group B [ ( 125.3 ± 28.3 ) min vs ( 131.3 ± 20.5 ) rain ]. There were no significant differences in the duration of hospital stay between the two groups [ (7.3 ± 2.4) days vs (7.8±1.9) days, P 〉 0.05] All patients were followed up ( range 3 months to 29 months, average 8.4 months). B-ultrasound examination showed no residual bile duct stones and the liver functions were normal. Conclusions Laparoscopie primary closure of common bile duct was possible after choledochotomy. Transcystic cholangiography and transcystic biliary drainage after primary closure of common bile duct were safer and more reliable.
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期24-27,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基金 镇江市卫生科技重点项目(SHW2015021) 镇江市社会发展科技计划项目(FZ2015073)
关键词 胆总管切开 腹腔镜 胆道外引流 细导管 一期缝合 Choledochotomy Laparoscope External biliary drainage Slender catheter Primary closure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1沈云志,陈炳芳,汪良芝,孙克文,王扬,茹佩瑛.经T管窦道导丝插入引导逆行胰胆管造影插管治疗胆道疾病[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(7):488-489. 被引量:1
  • 2刘英民 孙同义 高文杰.拔T管致胆汁性腹膜炎7例[J].中华普通外科杂志,2001,16(4):208-208. 被引量:5
  • 3吴在德.外科学:第5版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000,12.216-219. 被引量:55
  • 4Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335: 909-918. 被引量:1
  • 5Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective muhicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001, 96:417-423. 被引量:1
  • 6Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterot- omy complications and their management: an attempt at consen- sus. Gastrointest Endosc, 1991, 37:383-393. 被引量:1
  • 7Gottlieb K, Sherman S. ERCP and biliary endoscopic sphincter- otomy induced pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 1998,8:87-114. 被引量:1
  • 8Choudhary A, Beehtold M, Arif ML, et al. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,73:275-282. 被引量:1
  • 9Greea GL, Barbagallo F, Sofia M, et al. SimuLtaneous laparoendoscopie rendezvous for the treatment of cholecysto eholedocholithiasis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(4) : 769-780. 被引量:1
  • 10Rcibago LR, Vicente C, Soler F, et al. Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis[J]. Endoscopy, 2006,38(8) :779-786. 被引量:1

共引文献27

同被引文献117

引证文献15

二级引证文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部