摘要
马克思在《经济学手稿(1857—1858年)》中阐述了历史性方法的双重批判意蕴:一方面,历史性方法是对抽象理论的批判,即将抽象理论放置在具体的社会历史发展阶段中加以考察;另一方面,历史性方法是对资本主义社会的批判。只有通过对资本主义社会现实进行历史性批判,抽象理论的社会历史根源才能得以揭示。这一维度的批判构成了马克思历史性方法与其他社会科学方法之间的原则性区别。在马克思历史性方法的观照下,历史唯物主义经典理论将会得到重新理解,社会历史发展规律不再被理解为先验的、超历史的规律,历史唯物主义也不再被理解为一种僵化的理论教条,从而具有批判性和开放性的理论品格。
Marx elaborated the dual criticism implication of ＂Historical Method＂ in Economic Manuscript of 1857--1858. On the one hand, the historical methodis the criticism of abstract the- ories which should be researched in specific socialand historical development stage. On the other hand, the historical method is a critique of the capitalist society. The social and historical roots of abstract theories can only be revealed through the study of the historical criticism of the capitalist society reality. This dimension of criticalcriticism causes the fundamental difference between Marx＇s historical method and other methods of social science. In Marx＇s historical method, the classical theories of historical materialism will be understood in new view, the rule of social and historical development will no longer be interpreted into a transcendental and trans--historical rule, and historical materialism will be no more comprehended as a rigid theorydogma hut rather have critical and open theory characters.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期47-54,共8页
Teaching and Research
关键词
历史性方法
抽象理论
资本主义批判
历史唯物主义
historical method
abstract theories
critique of capitalist
historical materialism
