摘要
国际投资仲裁的透明度例外与透明度原则的根本目的一致，在立法价值上有其独特性。美国BIT和UNCITRAL仲裁规则中的透明度例外的立法模式和立法技术值得借鉴。ICSID的仲裁实践凸显了仲裁庭在决定透明度例外有关事项的重要作用。我国应对透明度例外应以保护国家秘密和商业秘密为基础，平衡透明度例外与诉讼进程的关系；可采取的具体措施包括：结合冲突规范与统一实体规范制定规则，明确透明度例外客体的范围，确定透明度例外实施中的当事人意思自治，合理配置仲裁庭的权力，完善我国相关国内立法。
The essential purpose of derogation of transparency in international investment arbitration is in compliance with principle of transparency. The legislation models and techniques of Bilateral Investment Treaties of USA and UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules deserves to be borrowed. It can be learned from experiences of ICSID that arbitral tribu- nals play an important role in determining issues concerning derogation of transparency. Faced with derogation of transparency, China ought to strike a balance between derogation of transparency and procedure of liti- gation, based on protection of national secrets and commercial secrets. The following measures can be taken： laying down regulations by combi- nation of conflict of laws and substantive laws, defining the range of ob- ject of derogation of transparency, establishing autonomy of will in im- plementing derogation of transparency, allocation of arbitral tribunals＇ power reasonably and enhancing relating domestic legislation.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2016年第4期72-83,共12页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词
国际投资仲裁
透明度例外
仲裁规则
双边投资条约
international investment arbitration
derogation oftransparency
arbitral rules
bilateral investment treaties
