期刊文献+

飞秒激光制瓣LASIK术后泪膜及视力的影响因素分析 被引量:4

Analysis of tear film and visual risk factors after LASIK with flap created by femtosecond laser
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察飞秒激光制瓣LASIK后泪膜的变化情况及视力的影响因素分析。方法:回顾性收集2014-06/2016-06我院行飞秒激光制瓣LASIK随访3mo的患者150例300眼,观察术前、术后1wk,1、2、3mo患者的干眼症状评分、泪膜破裂时间(breakup time,BUT)、泪液分泌试验(SchirmerⅠtest,SⅠt)、角膜荧光素染色(fluorescein staining,FL)评分的变化。结果:干眼症状评分:术前与术后3mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.863),术前与术后1wk,1、2mo比较有统计学意义(P=0.001、0.002、0.002);术后1wk与术后1mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.799),术后1wk与术后2、3mo比较有统计学意义(P=0.004)。BUT:术前与术后3mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.625),术前与术后1wk、1、2mo比较有统计学意义(P=0.029、0.017、0.002);术后1wk与术后1、2mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.827、0.672),术后1mo与术后2mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.423),术后1wk,1、2mo与术后3mo比较有统计学意义(P=0.001、0.023、0.026)。FL:术前与术后3mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.521),术前与术后1wk,1、2mo比较有统计学意义(P=0.001、0.019、0.026)。SⅠt:术前与术后3mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.749),术前与术后1wk,1、2mo比较有统计学意义(P=0.000、0.002、0.006);术后1wk与术后1、2mo比较无统计学意义(P=0.364、0.424),术后1wk,1、2mo与术后3mo比较有统计学意义(P=0.012、0.023、0.029)。多因素回归分析显示,术后视近时间、术前眼压、眼轴长度、术前BCVA及切削比为术后影响视力恢复危险因素。结论:飞秒激光制瓣LASIK导致术后干眼的发生,但一般持续时间较短,症状较轻,在术后3mo基本能恢复至接近术前水平,其发生机制与多种因素有关;同时,术后泪膜功能的检查结果,对术后的用药具有指导意义。 AIM: To study changes of tear film after femtosecond assistant laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK).METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 150 patients(300 eyes)selected in our hospital from June 2014 to June 2016 to and followed up for 3mo. The dry eye symptoms, break-up time(BUT), Schirmer Ⅰ test and fluorescein staining(FL)scores were observed preoperatively, 1wk, 1, 2, 3mo after operations.RESULTS:(1)dry eye symptom score: there was no significant difference between scores before operations and 3mo after operations(P=0.863); there were significant differences between scores before operations with 1wk, 1, 2mo after operations(P=0.001, 0.002, 0.002); there was no significant difference between scores at 1wk and 1mo after operations(P=0.799); there were significant differences between scores at 1wk after operations with 2,3mo after operations(P=0.004).(2)BUT: there was no significant difference between scores before operations and 3mo after operations(P=0.625); there were significant differences between scores before operations with 1wk, 1, 2mo after operations(P=0.029, 0.017, 0.002); there was no significant difference between scores at 1wk and 1, 2mo after operations(P=0.827, 0.672); there was no significant differences between scores at 1 and 2mo after operations(P=0.423); there were significant differences between scores at 3mo after operations with 1wk, 1, 2mo after operations(P=0.001、0.023、0.026).(3)FL:there was no significant difference between scores before operations and 3mo after operations(P=0.521); there were significant differences between scores before operations with 1wk, 1, 2mo after operations(P=0.001, 0.019, 0.026).(4)SⅠt: there was no significant difference between scores before operations and 3mo after operations(P=0.749); there were significant differences between scores before operations with 1wk, 1, 2mo after operations(P=0.000, 0.002, 0.006); there were no significant differences between
作者 刘慧颖
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2017年第1期47-49,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 飞秒激光制瓣LASIK 泪膜 干眼 laser in situ keratomileusis with flap created by femtosecond laser tear film dry eye
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献100

共引文献1379

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部