摘要
[目的 /意义]为了合理平衡合著论文中作者的科研贡献,在总结前人p指数计算方法的基础上,针对合著论文作者署名次序与作者贡献均等问题,提出基于合著作者贡献大小分配权值的p指数方法,以使p指数用于人才评价时更加有效合理。[方法 /过程]以图书情报学领域两位作者的科研论文产出为例,通过数据统计与对比分析得出4种不同p指数方法的计算结果。[结果 /结论]发现只考虑独著和第一作者发文情况的p_1指数与不考虑合著只要参与就计一次的p_2指数属于极端的处理方式;而按均分合著者权重计算的p_a指数忽略了著者署名次序的问题;根据娄策群的作者贡献率等级分配法计算所得的pw指数不仅考虑到作者合著情况,还考虑到对于一篇科研论文处于不同署名位次的作者贡献率不同。因此,根据贡献大小分配权值的p_w指数更具有客观合理性。
[ Purpose/significance ]In order to reasonably balance the co-authors＇ research contribution, this article summarizes predecessors＇ calculation method of p-index and aims at analyzing the co-authorship phenomenon and solving author signature sorting problems of the paper. Then, we present four calculation methods of p-index based on the co-au- thor contribution division value, making the p-index for scientific research evaluation more effective and reasonable. [ Method/process] Taking two experts in the field of library and information science as examples, we compared and ana- lyzed the results of four kinds of different calculations by data statistics and calculation. [ Result/conclusion] It finds out the two p-index calculation methods. One method only considers the situation of individual writing and the first author and the other method does not consider the situation of the co-authorship phenomenon. These two methods belong to the ex- treme treatments. The Pa-index which averagely distributes the co-author weight ignoring the author signature sorting prob- lem. The Pw-index calculated by Lou Cequn＇ s author contribution rate levels distribution method not only takes the co-au- thorship phenomenon into account, hut also considers the different author contribution rate in different author signature ranking. Therefore, the Pw-index based on the co-author contribution division value is more objective and rational.
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第21期81-86,共6页
Library and Information Service
基金
国家社科基金项目"基于量化与质性数据的跨学科合作行为研究"(项目编号:16BTQ078)研究成果之一
关键词
p指数
pw指数
作者合著
作者贡献率
科研评价
p-index
pw-index
co-authorship
author contribution rate
scientific research evaluation
