摘要
文章以经费收支为切入点分析了中美智库的组织治理机制。分析指出,美国主流智库的政策研究质量及政策影响力都遥遥领先于中国同行,这种差异是不同组织治理结构的产物。美国智库大多由社会创办并依赖于社会捐赠,在这种模式下,出资者参与、信息披露与税务监管形成智库的外部压力,而以研究和人力资本为核心的资金分配形成智库的内部激励,两种力量共同作用于智库,使之高效运作。相反,大部分中国智库的主体资金来自政府的财政拨款,出资者监管动力缺失、法律制度不完善以及信息不对称等问题阻碍了外部力量发挥作用。另一方面,智库的资金配置缺乏灵活性,并且忽视了对智力劳动的补偿,致使内部激励弱化。文章最后对新型智库建设提出了一些方向性的政策建议。
This paper analyzed the organizational governance of China and US think tanks through their structure of revenue and expenditure. Our analysis point out that the reason why US important think tanks have higher research quality and powerful impact on public policy relative to China counterparts relays on their good organizational governance. Most US think tanks are sponsored by private resources, under this mode, sponsors＇ direct involvement, information exposure and tax law create the outside pressure to think tanks, while expenditure focusing on research and human capital creates internal incentive for their researchers, these two forces push think tanks operate in a efficient way. To the contrary, China think tanks are funded and Managed by governments. Due to the problems from administration, law and asymmetry information, think tanks in China face weaken outside pressure; on the other hand, the distribution of revenue is less flexible and ignores the compensation for intellectual effort. We proposed some suggestions on designing the institution for better operation of China think tanks.
出处
《中国软科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第11期22-31,共10页
China Soft Science
基金
教育部重大攻关项目"决策咨询制度与中国特色新型智库建设研究"(14JZD023)
关键词
智库
经费
组织治理
中国
美国
thank tanks
finance
organizational governance
China
U. S.
