摘要
本文从批判性的视角概述了德国刑事诉讼法中关于证据采纳或者说是关于证据禁止的问题。证据禁止区分为非自主性证据使用禁止和自主性证据使用禁止。非自主性证据使用禁止可能是由于公诉中初步侦查时的取证错误导致的。就是否适用非自主性证据使用禁止这一问题,德国司法官会从几个方面加以考虑,例如,犯罪的严重性或者是取证错误的严重性。自主性证据使用禁止是由于侵犯了个人隐私。例如,私人日记不能作为证据使用。
This article gives an critical overview on the problem of admission or prohibition of evidence in German criminal procedure law. The Prohibition of evidence can be distinguished into non-autonomous and autonomous prohibition. Non-autonomous prohibition may result from mistakes made in evidential investigations during the preliminary investigation stage in public prosecution. The German judge would take several aspects into consideration regarding the problem of admission of non-autonomous prohibition of evidence, such as the seriousness of criminal behavior or the mistake of evidential investigation. The autonomous prohibition of evidence results from the invasion of personal privacy. For example, a private diary can not be used as evidence.
出处
《证据科学》
CSSCI
2016年第5期528-540,共13页
Evidence Science
基金
中国留学基金管理委员会(CSC)资助
关键词
证据
证明
证据禁止
证据采纳
证据收集
德国刑事诉讼法
Evidence
Proof
Prohibition of evidence
Admission of evidence
Evidence collection
German criminal procedure law
