摘要
2012年《民事诉讼法》及相关司法解释确立了庭前会议制度,标志着具实质意义的审前准备程序已经形成。作为审判活动的重要组成部分,庭前会议既为庭审做准备,又有相对的独立性,并承载着事实展示、争点确认、充实庭审以及促进和解与调解等多重功能。对庭前会议的实证考察表明,地方法院的积极探索为庭前会议的适用积累了丰富的实践经验,但也存在庭前会议内容不确定、效力不明确以及缺乏程序规范等问题。正确处理庭前会议与庭审的关系,坚持庭前会议与庭审一体化的程序设计,规范庭前会议的程序运作,明晰庭前会议中法官与当事人的作用分担,明确庭前会议的效力,有利于充分发挥庭前会议的功能。
The amended Civil Procedure Law and its judicial interpretations established the pretrial conference,which marked the substantial establishment of the pretrial procedure. As an important part of the trial activities,it is not only a preparatory part for the trial,but also has its own relative independence. The pretrial conference has many functions,such as exploring facts,identifying issues,enriching the trial and promoting reconciliation and mediation. The empirical research of the pretrial conference shows that the positive study of the district courts provide rich practical experience for the application of the pretrial conference. However,the pretrial conference also has such problems as the uncertain contents,the unclear effect and lack of procedural specification. In order to fully implement the pretrial conference,it should handle the relationship between the pretrial conference and the trial,insisting integrated program design for pretrial conference and the trial,standardizing procedures for the operation of pretrial conference,clarifying the role of judge and the parties in the pretrial conference activity and the effectiveness of the pretrial conference.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期146-154,共9页
Modern Law Science
关键词
庭前会议
证据交换
争点整理
庭前调解
集中审理
the civil pretrial conference
evidence exchange
collating disputable points
pretrial mediation
centralized trial
