期刊文献+

通道辅助下经关节突减压结合动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效 被引量:2

Clinical effects of dynamic neutralization system for the spine combined with transfacet decompression via extendable retractor for lumbar degenerative diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨通道辅助下经关节突减压结合动态稳定系统(Dynesys)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。方法选取2011年9月-2013年9月在宜昌市第二人民医院应用通道辅助下经关节突减压结合Dynesys螺钉固定治疗的腰椎退行性疾病患者36例,男20例,女16例;年龄31~67岁,平均年龄为(45±10)岁。其中腰椎管狭窄症14例,腰椎间盘突出症22例;病变累及1个节段28例,2个节段8例。手术先采用肌间隙入路于可扩张通道辅助下置入Dynesys螺钉,凿除部分关节突关节,切除增厚的黄韧带,暴露椎间孔,切除椎体后缘骨赘和突出的椎间盘,扩大中央椎管和神经根管的管径。减压满意后采用常规方法完成Dynesys螺钉固定。记录患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、拔除引流管的时间和术后下床活动时间。术前、术后和末次随访时根据疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估临床疗效,并根据X线片观察内固定情况(包括内固定位置、有无断裂等)。结果本组患者的手术时间为(125±34)min,术中出血量为(274±45)mL,术后引流量为(152±55)mL,平均拔除引流管的时间为术后(2.7±0.7)d,术后下活动床时间为术后(5.9±1.3)d。术前、术后和末次随访时的疼痛VAS评分分别为(7.41±1.19)、(2.44±1.46)、(2.25±1.50)分,0D1分别为(66.24±16.59)、(23.59±12.23)和(20.44±10.27)分。术后和末次随访时的疼痛VAS评分和ODI均显著低于术前(P值均〈0.05),术后与末次随访时的疼痛VAs评分和ODI的差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉0.05)。术后6个月随访X线片示,所有患者均无腰椎不稳征象,椎弓根钉棒无松动、断裂、变形。结论通道辅助下经关节突减压结合Dynesys螺钉固定治疗轻中度腰椎退行性疾病,可有效减少手术创伤,临� Objective To investigate the clinical effects of dynamic neutralization system for the spine (Dynesys system) combined with transfacet decompression via extendable retractor for lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods From September 2011 to September 2013, 36 patients suffering from lumbar degenerative disease were treated surgically in our hospital. There were 20 males and 16 females with an average age of (45±10) years (range, 31 -67 years). Preoperative diagnosis included lumbar spinal stenosis in 14 cases and lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in 22 cases. Single segment was involved in 28 cases and two segments were involved in 8 cases. Posterolateral fixation with Dynesys pedicle screws via extendable retractor was performed, and then part of the facet joint and thickened ligamentum flavum were resected. The intervertebral vertebral foramen was exposed unilaterally. After satisfactory decompression of the nerve root, Dynesys was performed according to normal procedure. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss. postoperative drainage, time of extubation and early postoperative activities were all recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied to evaluate the therapeutic effect before, after surgery and at the last follow- up. The outcome of internal fixation including location and presence of disrupt were observed by X-ray scan. Results The average operation time was (125+ 34) min, and the blood loss during operation and drainage after operation were (274 ±45) mL and (152±55) mL, respectively. The average time of removal of the drainage tube was (2.7 ±0.7) d. Patients could walk at (5.9 ± 1.3) d after surgery. VAS and ODI scores after surgery (2.44 ±1.46, 23.59± 12.23) and at the final follow-up (2.25 ±1.50, 20.44±10.27) were significantly lower than preoperative ones (7.41 ± 1.19, 66.24+ 16.59, all P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS or ODI score between postoperative a
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期536-540,I0001,共6页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 腰椎退行性疾病 通道 动态固定 减压 Lumbar degenerative disease Extendable retractor Dynamic fixation Decompression
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1VIDEBAEK T S, EGUND N, CHRISTENSEN F B, eta[. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion: the impact of anterior column support: a randomized clinical trial with an eight- to thirteen-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35 (22) : 1955-1964. 被引量:1
  • 2KANER T, SASANI M, OKTENOGLU T, et al. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2010, 20(2): 205-215. 被引量:1
  • 3SALEEM S, ASLAM H M, REHMANI M A, et al. Lumbar disc degenerative disease: disc degeneration symptoms and magnetic resonance image findings[J]. Asian Spine J, 2013, 7(4) : 322-334. 被引量:1
  • 4PHILLIPS F M, SLOSAR P J, YOUSSEF J A, et al. Lumbar spine fusion for chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: a systematic review [J]. Spine (Pbila Pa 1976), 2013, 38(7): E409-E422. 被引量:1
  • 5STEVENS K J, SPENCINER D B, GRIFFITHS K L, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006, 19(2): 77-86. 被引量:1
  • 6SCHWENDER J D, HOLLY L T, ROUBEN D P, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) : technical feasibility and initial results[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18 Suppl: S1-$6. 被引量:1
  • 7KRAEMER P, FEHLINGS M G, HASHIMOTO R, et al. A systematic review of definitions and classification systems of adjacent segment pathology[J] Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37(22 Suppl) : $31-$39. 被引量:1
  • 8VIALLE R, WICART P, DRAIN O, et al. The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 445 : 175- 180. 被引量:1
  • 9YOUSSEF J A, MCAFEE P C, PATTY C A, et al.Minimally invasive surgery., lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(26 Suppl) $302-$311. 被引量:1
  • 10MUSACCHIO M, PATEL N, BAGAN B, et al. Minimally invasive lumbar laminectomy via a dual-tube technique: evaluation in a cadaver model[J]. Surg Neurol, 2007, 6 (4) :348-352. 被引量:1

二级参考文献10

  • 1郭世绂 陈仲欣 等.腰椎管骨性结构的测量与椎管狭窄[J].中华外科杂志,1984,10:623-623. 被引量:20
  • 2李方财,陈其昕,徐侃,陈维善,吴琼华.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的早中期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(8):580-585. 被引量:31
  • 3Rosenberg WS,Mummaneni PV.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:technique,complications,and early results.Nenrosurgery,2001,48:569-574. 被引量:1
  • 4Harris BM,Hilibrand AS,Saves PE,et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.Spine,2004,29:65-70. 被引量:1
  • 5Lanber S,Sehuhe TL,Liljenqvist U,et al.Clinical and radioiogie 2-4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.Spine,2006,31:1693-1698. 被引量:1
  • 6Ma CWC.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with specialized instruments//Lin PM,Gill K,eds.Lumbar interbedy fusion.Rockville,MD:Aspen,1989:243-249. 被引量:1
  • 7Villavicencio AT,Burneikiene S,Bulsara KR,et al.Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability.J Spinal Disord Tech,2006,19:92-97. 被引量:1
  • 8Wong HK,Goh JC,Goh PS.Paired cylindrical interbedy cage fit and facetectomy in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population.Spine,2001,26.572-577. 被引量:1
  • 9Ebraheim NA,Xu R,Darwieh M,et al.Anatomic relations between the lumbar pedicle and the adjacent neural structures.Spine,1997,22:2338-2341. 被引量:1
  • 10Soyuncu Y,Yildirim FB,Sekben H,et al.Anatomic evaluation and relationship between the lumbar pediele and adjacent neural structures:an anatomic study.J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18:243 -246. 被引量:1

共引文献44

同被引文献24

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部