摘要
20世纪的俄语经典文学在当下俄国依然遭遇着十分意识形态化的解读,本文作者认为,无论是土壤派批评还是自由派批评,在对苏维埃经典做出评价时往往都带有政治意图,本文以当下俄国批评对普里什文、格林、阿·托尔斯泰、布尔加科夫和普拉东诺夫五位作家两种截然不同的接受为例,说明"20世纪上半期的俄国经典文学离我们越远,就变得越是意识形态化,越能引起纷争","20世纪上半期的俄国经典文学正在成为政治斗争中一枚可以兑换的硬币"。作者主张,对于经典作家及其作品的真正合理的解读方式还是返回文本,返回特定的历史语境。
The Soviet classical literature still is facing the very ideological interpretation. This paper＇ s author thinks that both the the Pochvenniks and the Liberals value the Soviet classics with their political purpose and, viewing the present-day Russian critics on M. Prishvin, A. Grin, A. Tolstoy, M. Bulgakov and P. Platonov as the instance, the author has pointed out that ＂the literary history of the first half of the 20th Century is becoming more ideological by going further into the past＂ and ＂the Russian classics of the first half of the 20th Century has become the exchangeable coin in the political struggle＂, and the best reading method of such writers is to return to the text and its historical context.
出处
《俄罗斯文艺》
CSSCI
2016年第4期27-34,共8页
Russian Literature & Arts
