摘要
太极动静问题是自周敦颐"太极动而生阳"思想提出以来,宋明儒家讨论较多的话题之一。朱熹视太极为至高本体,然而在其广大精微的思想体系中,太极动静问题存在双面性。这也给后儒,尤其是曹端、薛瑄等人造成了理论诠释上的诸多困扰,为此,他们二人提出了"活理"思想,认为理自身可以动静,从而提升了太极或理的能动性。韩国学者李滉提出了"理自会动静"的理动论,在解决了朱熹太极动静思想双面性问题困扰的同时,也为自己"四端""七情"的性理学体系建造了通畅的诠释路径。
The problem of Tai Chi movement was one of the topics discussed in the Song and Ming Dynasties since Zhou Dunyi＇s idea of ＂Tai Chi movement and Yang＂was put forward. Zhu Xi took Tai Chi as the highest body,but in the majority of subtle ideological system,there were dual problems of Tai Chi movement. This also gives the post Confucianism,especially Cao Duan and Xue Xuan,who caused a lot of problems in the interpretation of the theory,for this reason,they put forward the idea of ＂living＂,which is considered to be dynamic and static,to enhance the initiative of Tai Chi or theory. Then,the South Korean scholar Li Tuixi put forward ＂self movement＂on,in the settlement of the Zhu Xi＇s Tai Chi movement thought double-sided problem plagued for his ＂four terminal＂＂seven＂of Neo Confucianism system build the unobstructed path of interpretation.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期56-61,共6页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"中韩儒学发展路径及其现状比较研究"(15BZX067)
关键词
太极动静
朱熹
曹端
薛瑄
李滉
Tai Chi movement
Zhu Xi
Cao Duan
Xue Xuan
Li Huang
