摘要
《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民事诉讼法〉的解释》(以下简称为《民诉法解释》)规定了禁止重复起诉。在法律适用中,关于重复起诉的构成要件存在争议,尤其是对"后诉的诉讼请求实质上否定前诉裁判结果"的理解有较大分歧。在解释论上,"一事"应理解为后诉与前诉在主要争点上具有同质性;"实质上"应理解为经过程序保障的本质评价;"否定"应理解为"全部否定";裁判结果应重点考察主要争点。
Interpretation of the Supreme the People＇s Republic of China regulate People＇s Court on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of s the ＂ban on repeated prosecution＂. In the application of law, there have long been controversies about composition elements of repeated prosecution, especially a split of sentence regarding the meaning of its repeated prosecution. In the interpretative theory, ＂the same act＂ should be interpreted as homogeny in the main issue covering the formal and later lawsuit. ＂Essence＂ is mainly about quality evaluation experiencing procedure guarantee. ＂Negation＂ is regarded as total negation. ＂Results of judgment＂ should focus on main issues.
作者
李谦
LI Qian(Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210023)
出处
《浙江万里学院学报》
2016年第5期52-57,共6页
Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
关键词
重复起诉
一事不再理
既判力
争点效
repeated prosecution
non bis in idem
power of effective judgments
issue preclusion validity
