摘要
理由是将特定事实带入某一法律要件作出决定的原因说明。在行政机关行使裁量权时,不说明裁量理由,就无法让人知晓为何在裁量权的范围内作出该决定。根据行政法治原理,应当将说明裁量理由设定为法定义务,以论证裁量决定合乎法律。公开裁量决定的判断和选择过程,这既有助于抑制行政机关的恣意,也有助于说服行政相对人,也便于私人寻求救济和司法实施审查。裁量理由与裁量决定应当具有同时性和一体性。没有说明或者说明不充分时,因行政机关没有按照要求说明裁量理由,为尊重行政机关的首次判断权起见,法院应撤销裁量决定;如果行政机关在事后以其他理由替换原先已说明的理由,在没有改变主要理由时,法院则可基于诉讼经济原则一并审查,一次性解决纠纷。
Reasons are the illustration for the causes of applying specific facts to a certain legal element. If administrative organ exercises discretionary powers without giving reasons, why to make the decision within the scope of the discretionary power cannot be understood. According to the principle of the administrative government by law, illustrating discretionary reasons should be enacted as a statutory duty so as to compel the administrative organ to prove its＇ discretionary decision complying with the law and disclose the process of judgment and selection. The discretionary reasons and the discretionary decision should be simultaneous and integrated. If there is no illustration for the reasons or incomplete illustration, the court should revoke the discretionary decision because the primary judgment power to give some reason should be deferred. If the administrative organ replace the given reasons afterwards and don＇ t change the main reasons, the court may review them together so as to settle their dispute all at once according to the theory of judicial economy.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期37-48,共12页
Modern Law Science
关键词
行政裁量
裁量理由
说明理由
理由的替换
理由的补充
administrative discretion
discretionary reasons
illustrating reasons
replacement of teasons
complement of reasons
