摘要
《道路交通安全法》和《侵权责任法》颁布之后,最高法针对交通事故损害赔偿案件又做出《适用法律司法解释》,明确了道路交通事故赔偿责任主体具体的担责原则。然而面对纷繁复杂的司法实践,游离于法律边缘的赠与行为、出质、维修、保管等行为可以通过扩张解释即可阐明;已有的擅驾、出租行为通过反思与检讨,运用目的解释即可找到答案;未被规制的好意同乘、承包车辆等行为,在区分不同情形的基础上按照控制与风险理论原理予以确定。
After the promulgation of＂The Law of Road Traffic Safety＂and＂Tort Liability Law＂,the Supreme Court has made＂applicable law and judicial interpretation＂in view of traffic accident damage compensation cases. There has been specific responsibility principle for subject of liability road traffic accidents compensation. However,in the face of numerous and complicated judicial practice,Gift behavior at the edge of law,pledge,maintenance,custody and other acts have been clearly through expansion interpretation.Driving without authorization and rental vehicles behavior have been clearly on the basis of re-examination. As a result,lifts with good intentions and contracting vehicles acts need to be determined urgently.
出处
《南阳理工学院学报》
2016年第5期26-29,共4页
Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology
基金
2012年度河南省科技厅软科学研究项目(122400420008)
关键词
交通事故损害赔偿
擅驾行为
好意同乘
traffic accident damage compensation
driving without authorization
lifts with good intentions
